Assume, for the sake of argument, that Lynch is telling the truth, you are then left with this scenario:
Clinton knew that Lynch was going to be in Phoenix.
Clinton held up his departure so as to be on the tarmac at the time that Lynch arrived.
Clinton had someone leak to the reporter that he was on the tarmac and going to meet with Lynch, (reports were that he was tipped off and got there in time to get the story), not a coincident.
Clinton or the DNC had already arranged for Comey to usurp Lynch’s power because she was going leaning to agree to indict Hillary.
Lynch had to be made to recuse or allow Comey to usurp her.
Questions? How would Clinton know where Lynch would be? Comey? DOJ senior staff?
I think you have it perfect. It makes sense.
Loretta Lynch does not strike me as being a dishonest person. Not like Susan Rice and the rest of that bunch.
I think Clinton, planned to usurp and undermine Lynch by being there.
It makes perfect sense, and of course, she’s too dumb to realize what the guy was doing.
In short, COmey was in the bag for them, BUT BUT BUT
HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN COMEY COMING OUT IN THE CLOSING WEEKS OF THE ELECTION TO RE OPEN THE FILE ON CLINTON...?