Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

diGenova Would Like To See Mueller Testify. Questions Are Endless What Mueller Did Was A Disgrace.
WMAL Morning Show ^ | May 6, 2019

Posted on 05/06/2019 10:11:05 AM PDT by billorites

INTERVIEW – JOE DIGENOVA – legal analyst and former U.S. Attorney to the District of Columbia

Filed Under: Mornings On The Mall, Mornings on the Mall Interviews

MORE FROM WMAL NEWS



TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: digenova; muellerreport; trumprussia; wmal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
Click on WMAL Listen Link to hear today's interview.
1 posted on 05/06/2019 10:11:05 AM PDT by billorites
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: billorites

Democrats say they want him to testify, but the ones in the know are bluffing. I want him to testify, under oath, with Gohmert and Nunes asking him the questions. Let him worry about perjury for a change.

He can defend his report, and perjure himself, or answer truthfully and bury his report. Either way he is sunk.


2 posted on 05/06/2019 10:14:13 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites

“CNN’s Alisyn Camerota lets her anti-Trump bias fly in wake of Mueller report: ‘Sorry if I sound like they’ve broken my spirit’”

I think the former highly conservative news caster sold her spirit down the river when she became the new rabid liberal news caster for CNN.


3 posted on 05/06/2019 10:20:37 AM PDT by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites

There are a few questions that I would like answered under oath:

When did you first learn that the Steele document was used for a FISA warrant?

When you found out that misleading testimony was entered before the FISA court to obtain a warrant, did you report that information to the court?

What is the federal charge for knowingly mislead a court (perjury) regarding a warrant?

Why have you not refereed any of the culprits of the fraud on the court for prosecution?


4 posted on 05/06/2019 10:20:51 AM PDT by taxcontrol (Stupid should hurt - dad's wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron

Oath does not matter....Lying to Congress under oath or not under oath....is a crime.


5 posted on 05/06/2019 10:23:12 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

When did you know there was no collusion with Russia..


6 posted on 05/06/2019 10:23:30 AM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

He won’t dare show up. He’ll have to mumble something meaningless like Barr not having to show up — except of course that Barr did show up.


7 posted on 05/06/2019 10:30:35 AM PDT by treetopsandroofs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Theft and fraudulent use of a social security number is a crime, too, except for Democrats.


8 posted on 05/06/2019 10:32:21 AM PDT by treetopsandroofs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat
I think the former highly conservative news caster sold her spirit down the river when she became the new rabid liberal news caster for CNN.

I have news for you. She was never a "highly conservative news caster." Like all of these morons, she was a well-paid TV whore who would pretend she was whatever she thought she needed to be to get on the air with a big contract.

9 posted on 05/06/2019 10:32:47 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Out on the road today I saw a Deadhead sticker on a Cadillac.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

She was never conservative. People assume so because she worked at Fox.


10 posted on 05/06/2019 10:32:51 AM PDT by richardtavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

I’ve been wondering if Trump’s saying he doesn’t want Mueller to testify is Brer rabbit saying, “Don’t throw me in the briar patch.” It seems to me that Republicans should have a lot of questions for Mueller and would like to see him answer under oath.


11 posted on 05/06/2019 10:33:41 AM PDT by Kipp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

Since the Steele document was linked to Russian Information why didn’t you investigate it?

Since Mifsud has ties to the State Department why did your report make him out to be a Russian asset?

How did you know Mifsud talked to Papadopoulos about the Russian emails before you questioned Mifsud?

Which agency sent the blond honey trap to Papadopoulos?

Most important questions of all.

Why did you not report that there was no collusion over a year ago after it was determined?

And why did you let the cloud of suspicion hang over the President of the United States head for over a year after he was cleared by your investigation?

Did you let the cloud of suspicion hang over the President’s head to influence the 2018 election?

Did you purposely do more damage to our election than any Russian influence?


12 posted on 05/06/2019 10:35:20 AM PDT by BushCountry (thinks he needs a gal whose name doesn't end in ".jpg")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: billorites

Trump wants him to testify. He is goading the Democrats to insist, and then Mueller won’t be able to answer.


13 posted on 05/06/2019 10:35:28 AM PDT by richardtavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron

exactly what I was thinking...I’m sure DiGenova knows best...LOL


14 posted on 05/06/2019 10:37:24 AM PDT by magna carta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

Why didn’t you select your team from a mix of Republicans and Democrats?

Why would you allow pro-Hillary partisans on your team when they’d obviously come in with extreme biases?

Did your team do (or contract to have done) a forensic investigation into the baud rate of the data taken/copied/hacked/downloaded from the DNC servers?

Were any of the other presidential candidates/campaigns investigated at all for potential Russian collusion and/or interference? If not, why not?

During the course of your investigation, did anyone on your team discover any law-breaking - major or minor - by any people, companies or agencies outside of the Trump sphere? If so, what were the results of those discoveries?


15 posted on 05/06/2019 10:39:15 AM PDT by Two Kids' Dad (((( Wake me when a prominent democrat gets prosecuted. ))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: billorites

“Reporter won’t say if ‘sexy blonde’ who targeted Papadopoulos worked for FBI”

Drag the sleazy little B***h in front of Congress and the whole country and force her to talk

She and her buddies put everyone in the President’s campaign through torture, interrogation, solitary confinement and every other form of State terrorism, time to find out who she is, who she was working for and what level of punishment she’s gonna get for doing it


16 posted on 05/06/2019 10:42:35 AM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
Here's what I don't get...If Steele was an agent working for the FBI during tthe Dossier Creation days, why did Steele give it to McCain...who gave it to Comey (Dec 9 2016).

Comey must have already known about it DIRECTLY from Steele.

In other words, it looks like McCain got set up.

Now it makes sense. And it makes more sense that Comey NEVER investigated the phony dossier....cuz he already KNEW it was phony.

17 posted on 05/06/2019 10:49:43 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: marron

Among the interesting questions in my mind are those
involving investigative processes/ methods. One
could almost hear Mueller’s asshole puckering
from miles away from the capitol building.


18 posted on 05/06/2019 10:52:10 AM PDT by Sivad (Demo M/O = infiltrate, overtake, politicize, weaponize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BushCountry
Dear DerMueller:

REGARDING RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE, WHY DIDN'T YOU INTERVIEW NATALIA VESELNITSKAYA?

19 posted on 05/06/2019 10:55:47 AM PDT by CivilWarBrewing (Get off my back for my usage of CAPS, especially you snowflake males! MAN UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: treetopsandroofs

042-68-4425 was the SS number Barry Sotoero used for most of his adult life until the SSA gave him a valid one when everybody found out about his fraudulent use of that one.

Why would a natural born citizen have to use a fraudulent SS#?


20 posted on 05/06/2019 10:57:28 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson