Well, I and dozens of my co-workers who held security clearances think Hillary Clinton should be in prison for that home mail server she had and all the classified information she passed on unsecure networks. Our opinions have about as much weight as those former DOJ lawyers.
This says more about the political bias of the DoJ than it does about any alleged obstruction by Trump.
Obstructing an illegal investigation that was created to cover up crimes is not a crime....it is a duty.
(And by the way, former Justice Department Officials - whatever that means - Mueller has already told Barr that the standard that a sitting President couldn't be charged or indicted had nothing to do with his non-decision on obstruction of justice - that is, the non-decision was made with no consideration of Trump's position as President)......
former.
Where do I send the tube of KY Jelly to help with this inane Liberal circle jerk?
Tell me, just how hard is it to find a Democrat working for the gubmint?
A Justice Department official ?
Um....
You...mean...like...an..employee ? Yes, the cafeteria servers opinions are important, but do not hold much legal substance.
All on the Clinton and Obama payroll
Attorneys once again showing why they are at the top of “the list”.
Did all of them say the same thing regarding Bill Clinton in 1998-1999? In that case the underlying issue was definitely a crime of perjury in the Paula Jones case. In the case of Trump its about them grasping at straws to try to manufacture a crime out of thin air.
We have gotten to the point in this country where any of us can be charged with multiple offenses at any time, due to overregulation across every level of government. Plus, Trump is not a lawyer and did not favor bringing in the Deep Staters who knew about the traps.
So, in conclusion, &*#$ them.