Zero Standing, carries as much weight as if I submitted something, it’s ALL political.
It's like using the idea of the popular vote in a presidential election to cancel out the way the electoral college works.
It's like Anthropogenic Global Warming supposedly turning opinions into scientific fact, despite their lack of true scientific basis, just the virtue of some large number of "scientists" (government teat hangers-on among, largely among academics) being willing to sign their name to a politically-oriented weapon.
It's like Einstein's "Spooky Working" being dressed in figurative "purple robes" and handed a Nobel Prize for describing the photoelectric he observed, even though the original discovery was J.J. Thompson's. (Albert was wrong about the working of what he described, but it didn't matter when the destruction of Tesla's genius was actually at issue.) Einstein's Theory of General Relativity was first known as the "Lentz transform" and described by Henri Poincaré. Einstein was all about imbuing the emptiness of space and time with nonexistent the attributes of pseudo-science, but instead of ousting Einstein for plagiarism ((and "fuzzy-haired idiocy" (Tesla's words)), the preponderance of scientists, physicists and mathematicians and academic Ph.D.-types swallowed any principles they had and gave Einstein every accolade, teaching their kids and grandkids that Einstein was the world's pre-eminent genius when the man invented nothing and bequeathed only the brain-dead religion of bumping magical unicorn particles millions onto Ph.D.s after him to keep them employed and getting government grants from the 1950s to eternity. Consensus worked!
So now, some number of former has-beens want to create a new way to remove a president, by petition of our betters. Never mind that the Constitution cannot be so amended. They think they're smart, deserve respect and they hate that guy PDJT.
No, the AG at the DOJ gets to determine who's going to be indicted or not. For his tenure, he gets to be the arbiter of legal interpretation for those working for the DOJ and FBI. Only because Mueller has a diverging opinion about the legal interpretation of obstruction sub-paragraphs are these malcontents trying to weaponize their signature-opinions to overthrow Barr or his interpretation of the statutes, on the paper-thin hope they can use Mueller's obstruction interpretation to still get at a possible impeachment of PDJT. But Barr's authorities are not open to be infringed upon by some number of malcontents, any more than the previous examples deserve to upset the apple carts of their respective well-orderliness.