Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gaijin
Better speed that clock up.

Precedence dictates there’ll be no SCOTUS picks during an election year.

13 posted on 05/16/2019 7:29:15 AM PDT by daler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: daler

“Precedence dictates there’ll be no SCOTUS picks during an election year.”

Incorrect. Only during a lame duck session, which Trump won’t be until 2023.


29 posted on 05/16/2019 8:01:23 AM PDT by bk1000 (I stand with Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: daler

The pure pleasure of watching McConnell allow the vote to replace Ginsburg during an election year. Would that outweigh Trump’s election issue of having that pick in jeopardy of a democrat president in 2021?


31 posted on 05/16/2019 8:06:57 AM PDT by hardspunned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: daler

That is true, but in that situation, the empty SCOTUS seat would probably lead to more 5-3 decisions than 4-4 decisions. Not necessarily a bad thing.


40 posted on 05/16/2019 8:47:13 AM PDT by BoringGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson