[I have never instructed a witness as to what to say specifically]
That’s her weasel statement immediately following.
Comey was not a “witness” when she told him “a matter”.
Comey didn’t become “a witness” until a long time later.
We may not agree. That’s OK. I don’t trust any of them.
Not at all.
We may not agree.
We agree that what she said was 'off', I just don't believe her statement applied to Comey and that it applied to someone else.
Comey didn’t become “a witness” until a long time later.
An unconscious injection into the conversation, perhaps, or an attempt to divert the conversation in another direction.
It definitely deserves scrutiny.
I don’t trust any of them.
Nor do I knowing what we know now.
Lynch talks gun control, ISIS threat and Clinton email probe 'Fox News Sunday' Jun. 19, 2016
mark - 8:07
The investigation into the State Department email matter is going to be handled like any other matter.
She uses matter twice and she didn't correct Wallace when he used "criminal investigation" before her reply. She inserted the language into the conversation.
Needless to say IMO she is lying about the exchange between the two of them using her interview as the predicate for my opinion.