Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hojczyk
“If we had confidence the president DID NOT commit a crime we would have said so. We did not however make a determination if the president did commit a crime.”

BS. He is supposed to refer if he sees a crime. There is no in between. That is NOT the standard by which he operates.

"We are sure there is a crime there. We just could not find it so we had to not say it..." Complete and total BS.

15 posted on 05/29/2019 8:33:52 AM PDT by gunsequalfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: gunsequalfreedom

This is a somewhat special case. He certainly could have referred with a recommendation, even knowing that there could be no actual indictment. That, however is not where the line was drawn.

Mueller decided he didn’t have a case to even attempt or recommend an indictment.


232 posted on 05/29/2019 12:11:16 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson