The second amendment says nothing about suppressors. That is a stretch.
I agree he doesn’t “get it” about them, but they could be banned and your right to defend yourself has not been altered.
You could say the same thing about any firearm accessory, including optics, slings, bipods. Freedom haters think your “right to defend yourself” isn’t diminished by being limited to single-shot firearms.
The second amendment says nothing about guns.
Yes, that's right. "Guns" are not specifically protected by name in the Constitution. I guess it's OK to ban them outright. Right?
The word is "arms". It covers rocks, pointed sticks, knives, swords, axes, lbows, blowguns, pistols, rifles, shotguns, machineguns, suppressors, bombs, rockets, armed vehicles, LASERS, MASERS, phasers, blasters, lightsabers ...
“I agree he doesn’t “get it” about them, but they could be banned and your right to defend yourself has not been altered.”
That is a lie.