“Yes, people have the right to defend themselves from tyrants. The failure of some people to exercise that right properly in the past does not negate the right.”
Never said it did negate that right. But guess what, by your logic, George Washington himself is anti-second amendment precisely because he put down the Whiskey Rebellion, which, last I checked, was an ARMED rebellion.
Heck, if I were to go fully to the extreme on being pro-second amendment as you seem to be advocating, I’d reduce America into a warzone where everyone kills everyone for a sick laugh, hand guns to criminals and law enforcement alike, and telling them to laugh, even encouraging them to kill me as well. You know, similar to the crap Jerome Valeska pulled here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHFwBhZniiQ Heck, just like with the French Revolution, even.
Congratulations. You have made the most ignorant remark on the thread. GW PUT DOWN A REBELLION. IT WASN'T ABOUT WEAPONS, IT WAS ABOUT NON-PAYMENT OF TAXES!!!!
This discussion is ended. You lost.