[9YearLurker]

I love Binney. And I don’t doubt but that it was an internal exfiltration rather than a hack..

But I’m not sure Binney’s evidence is conclusive, as last I saw his argument was that the data speed was too high for intercontinental online connections. Yet that doesn’t address whether a closer-to-home hack would have been possible.

[chaosagent]

Yet that doesn’t address whether a closer-to-home hack would have been possible.

---

Define ‘closer-to-home’.

Seems like I remember that the speeds quoted for the download pretty much ruled out any kind of remote Internet connection.

Almost had to be direct.

[Pollard]

USB 2.0 will transfer up to 60mb per second. Presuming the DNC computer was not a web server, it would have a typical business/residential IP connection. Whatever the upload speed is on that connection would be the download limit for another internet connected machine. Upload speeds are much much slower than download speeds on internet connections that are not web servers aka home/business connections.

4G upload speeds are about (25Mbps) or 3mb per second compared to USB 2.0 transfer speed of 60mb per second.

Be that as it may, Binney has been saying the same thing for about a year but there’s been no action.

[Yardstick]

I’m no expert but I’d be surprised if the remoteness of the network connection would make a meaningful difference. I think it’s just the fact of a network connection — any network connection — versus a thumb drive.

[ConservativeMind]

How about when Wikileaks giving a $20,000 reward for evidence leading to the murder of Seth?

Are you obtuse?

[itsahoot]

But I’m not sure Binney’s evidence is conclusive

His isn't but Comey's is? And you can't even see Comey's, right.