Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lodi90; LS
There is nothing for Trump to lead.

Au contraire - he has 50% of the country (militia) and maybe one-half military. So, why doesn't he act?

Consider Napoleon's 100 days. He simply boated away from Elba and began to walk towards Paris. Within 2 months, he was marching with an army, causing the French government to flee and allowing Napoleon to resume his (former) position as head of state. If Waterloo had turned out differently ...

Anyway, the point is that Trump, unlike Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Monroe, et al, is unwilling to launch a revolutionary war. Or, unlike Lincoln, the civil war, or unlike Wilson, WWI, or unlike Roosevelt, WWII. In other words, while Trump is an interesting, unique character, he doesn't really have "what it takes" to be a seminal, historical figure. And the reason for that is because he's actually risk averse and fundamentally non-violent.

Name a famous leader - male or female - at any point in time at any location on earth, and they all share one common characteristic: they are all willing to bet it all. Trump isn't, and that's all we need to know. As you said, the uniparty/deep state figured him out long ago. That's why they ignore him, taunt and belittle him, and basically just screw with him knowing that he will be gone in either 2 or 6 years.

79 posted on 06/10/2019 9:41:35 AM PDT by semantic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: semantic

This is so off I don’t know where to begin.

Trump has already reached “seminal leader” stage.


86 posted on 06/10/2019 5:00:04 PM PDT by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson