Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Panic sets in.

Democrats realize they've lost control of the system so they now want it to be 'independent'.

1 posted on 06/28/2019 11:04:53 AM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: yesthatjallen

Well, there goes California..................


2 posted on 06/28/2019 11:05:41 AM PDT by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

And of course the Democrat redistricting would be so much more fair than the Republican redistricting. It would be true to the Democracy that is the United States (in their minds), vs the Republic set out in our Constitution.


3 posted on 06/28/2019 11:08:00 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (This space for rent...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen
Each commission would be evenly divided among three political affiliations — the state’s majority party, minority party and an unaffiliated or minor party.

so.....Republicans 1/3, Democrats 1/3, Green Party 1/3? Yeah I can see where THIS is headed.


4 posted on 06/28/2019 11:08:23 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

California wants to write all the laws for the USA.
I’m serious!
When has any State law from a Conservative State ever been adopted in CA?
Never has, never will.


5 posted on 06/28/2019 11:09:33 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

They want to tell other states what to do? Go to he!! California.....likely already there.


8 posted on 06/28/2019 11:14:14 AM PDT by Midwesterner53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Why don’t they try it in California, and see how it works out first?


9 posted on 06/28/2019 11:14:23 AM PDT by Sooth2222 ("Every nation gets the government it deserves." -Joseph de Maistre)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Congress can’t impose restrictions on states’ redistricting laws/practices. That’s why SCOTUS ruled the way they did — the issue is properly left up to the states.


10 posted on 06/28/2019 11:15:27 AM PDT by LIConFem (I will no longer accept the things I cannot change. it's time to change the things I cannot accept.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Stuffing the ballot box is a NECESSITY for the RATS. Yes, they are in a panic. Cheating, lying, crime are their tools for “success” at the ballot box. Been that way since Tammany Hall....


11 posted on 06/28/2019 11:16:37 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen
the Supreme Court ruled that courts can’t resolve partisan gerrymandering claims ... And the bill calls for a three-judge court.

Their bill explicitly does what the Supreme Court just said they cannot do.

12 posted on 06/28/2019 11:32:18 AM PDT by libertylover (Democrats hated Lincoln too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen
This measure has been introduced in the United State House of Representatives, led by a gaggle of Democrats. The Congress role in the elections of representatives to Congress are included in the Elections Clause.

They addressed the election of Representatives to Congress in the Elections Clause,cArt. I, §4, cl. 1, assigning to state legislatures the power to prescribe the “Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections” for Members of Congress, while giving Congress the power to “make or alter” any such regulations. Congress has regularly exercised its Elections Clause power, including to address partisan gerrymandering. But the Framers did not set aside all electoral issues as questions that only Congress can resolve.

13 posted on 06/28/2019 11:34:29 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

They completely misunderstand the court’s ruling. It is the STATE LEGISLATURES’ place to set districts in their states, not the courts, not Congress, and not unelected bureaucrats.


14 posted on 06/28/2019 11:49:06 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Where does it say in the Constitution anyone is entitled to the property another has labored for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

A nice history of how we came to have congressional districts, as opposed to state-wide elections for representatives, in the first place:

http://archive.fairvote.org/?page=1724


16 posted on 06/28/2019 12:59:52 PM PDT by VanShuyten ("...that all the donkeys were dead. I know nothing as to the fate of the less valuable animals.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

“independent”.. yeah , right, Zoe.


17 posted on 06/28/2019 1:14:47 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Monthly Donors Rock!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson