Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Littoral Combat Ship Deploys for First Time in 19 Months; USS Montgomery Left Unannounced
USNI News ^ | July 1, 2019 10:41 PM | Megan Eckstein

Posted on 07/03/2019 1:16:42 AM PDT by robowombat

Littoral Combat Ship Deploys for First Time in 19 Months; USS Montgomery Left Unannounced in Early June

By: Megan Eckstein July 1, 2019 12:26 PM • Updated: July 1, 2019 10:41 PM

The littoral combat ship USS Montgomery (LCS-8) departs Naval Base San Diego to conduct routine operations and training in the Pacific Ocean. US Navy photo.

This post has been updated to include a comment from a Navy official regarding the timeline of the USS Montgomery deployment.

There is a Littoral Combat Ship operating forward on deployment for the first time in 19 months, with USS Montgomery (LCS-8) arriving in the Philippines over the weekend on its maiden deployment.

The Navy did not announce the departure of Montgomery from its San Diego, Calif., homeport, but the service on Saturday released a news release and several photos of the LCS during its first port call of the deployment, in Davao City on the island of Mindanao.

“In this era of Great Power Competition, the U.S. Pacific Fleet does not announce the deployment of every ship in the Pacific,” a Navy official told USNI News after this story was first published. “USS Montgomery departed its homeport of San Diego in late May, as part of a deployment to the U.S. 7th Fleet area of operations.”

According to commercial ship tracking data, Montgomery made a port call in Hawaii and left on June 10 to continue its trip towards 7th Fleet.

According to the Navy news release, Montgomery will host local military and civic leaders during the port visit.

“Our navies, just like our nations, have a long history of cooperation and partnership based on mutual trust, respect and decades of friendship,” Rear Adm. Joey Tynch, commander of Logistics Group Western Pacific, said in the news release. “Every port visit and exercise we complete together continues to strengthen maritime security and regional stability.”

The Independence-variant LCS went through the first-ever LCS Surface Warfare Advanced Tactical Training (SWATT) event in April as part of its pre-deployment workups. During that five-day at-sea event, Montgomery’s crew practiced surface warfare operations – including live-fire shots with the crew-served weapon, 30mm gun and SeaRAM missile defense system – as well as limited anti-air warfare operations.

The ship also practiced some missions on its own and some falling under the tactical control of a warfare commander on another ship, simulating how the LCS might be used solo or as part of a larger task group on its deployment.

Independence variant littoral combat ship USS Montgomery (LCS 8) launches a RIM-116 Rolling Airframe Missile (RAM) during a missile exercise on April 23, 2019. Montgomery is underway in the Eastern Pacific conducting routine training. US Navy photo.

USS Coronado (LCS-4) was the last LCS to deploy overseas, from June 2016 to December 2017. Since that deployment, though, the LCS community has gone through a major reorganization that involves moving from a system of three crews supporting two ship hulls to a blue/gold crewing model similar to that used in the submarine community; the creation of a test division that includes the first four LCSs, which will now focus on mission package testing and other work at home and will not deploy overseas; the standup of Littoral Combat Ship Squadron 1 (LCSRON-1) in San Diego that includes all the Austal-built Independence-variant ships; and the standup of LCSRON-2 in Mayport, Fla., for the Lockheed Martin-built Freedom-variant hulls.

The Navy had not planned to have such a long gap between LCS deployments, but in part due to trying to implement the new organizational structure and in part due to LCS hull maintenance availabilities, USNI News first reported in April 2018 that there would be no LCS deployments that calendar year.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: lcs; usn
Well it hasn't collided with anything yet.
1 posted on 07/03/2019 1:16:42 AM PDT by robowombat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Those things are floating death traps. Reminds me of when after the first gulf war the Army tried to lighten armored battalions. That was well and good until the shooting started again.


2 posted on 07/03/2019 1:43:37 AM PDT by DariusBane (Liberty and Risk. Flip sides of the same coin. So how much risk will YOU accept? Vive Deo et Vives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
>
3 posted on 07/03/2019 2:56:55 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

The Lockheed-Martin build hull version looks a bit more conventional:

https://4gwar.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/lcs-lockmart.jpg


4 posted on 07/03/2019 3:04:45 AM PDT by Drago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Did they get their diversity & perversity training prior to deployment?


5 posted on 07/03/2019 3:09:19 AM PDT by MSF BU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DariusBane

They look as if they would be tossed around quite a bit in heavy seas.


6 posted on 07/03/2019 4:06:13 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (If we get Medicare for all, will we have to show IDs for service?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
the U.S. Pacific Fleet does not announce the deployment of every ship in the Pacific

Because a single 57mm gun is going to shift the balance of power in the region. At least the LCS has a gun that fires, unlike the new, state of the art, destroyers.

7 posted on 07/03/2019 5:14:28 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
The monkeys have no tails in Zamboanga
8 posted on 07/03/2019 5:17:56 AM PDT by bert ( (KE. NP. N.C. +12)There were Democrat espionage operations on Republican candidates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

It’s a good thing the departure was unannounced. If another ship had been present to witness it, there is a high likelihood the navy ship would have collided with it.


9 posted on 07/03/2019 5:29:10 AM PDT by FreedomOfExpression
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

I heard from a relative that their friends daughter was called for duty yesterday. They are a pilot.


10 posted on 07/03/2019 5:53:28 AM PDT by Plumres
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Flush the toilet on the admirals who are pushing for these pieces of garbage and start building some effective fighting ships!


11 posted on 07/03/2019 5:55:31 AM PDT by 60Gunner (The price of apathy towards public affairs is to be ruled by evil men. - Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

They are not intended for heavy seas. They are intended for operations close to shore, a.k.a. the littoral environment.


12 posted on 07/03/2019 6:09:18 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie

“They are not intended for heavy seas. They are intended for operations close to shore, a.k.a. the littoral environment.“

Lucky thing the seas never get heavy near land.

L


13 posted on 07/03/2019 6:16:43 AM PDT by Lurker (Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Fair enough, I meant blue ocean operations. These are based on commercial transports as an experiment, get speed and sacrifice some other things so you can rapidly counter threats from small craft and the like. So yeah, they aren’t good in a hurricane or tropical storm.

They are kind of useless I think. They were created when we thought there was no fleet that could challenge us on the blue ocean so what we needed were fast ships that could sweep the coasts and ports for threats. Times change, China and Russia have bigger, more capable ships with more advanced weapons now so destroyers are more in vogue now. But we still have these.


14 posted on 07/03/2019 6:53:28 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie

“They are kind of useless I think.”

Me too. One gun? How stupid is that idea?

L


15 posted on 07/03/2019 6:57:39 AM PDT by Lurker (Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie

“They are not intended for heavy seas. They are intended for operations close to shore, a.k.a. the littoral environment.”

Methinks the problem is they have to cross the ocean to get to most of those littoral environments.


16 posted on 07/03/2019 7:06:03 AM PDT by Lowell1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Reminded me of one transit from Southern California to our homeport in Bremerton on Nimitz in 1988. Not far off the coast of Oregon I watched the inclinometer on the bridge hit 24 degrees.


17 posted on 07/03/2019 7:45:14 AM PDT by GreyHoundSailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
"Well it hasn't collided with anything yet."

OTOH, there will probably be many medals given out for finding Mindanao...

18 posted on 07/03/2019 6:08:05 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is Sam Adams now that we desperately need him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson