[DiogenesLamp]

No. I absolutely reject your premise. These sites are now defacto "commons", and as such, they must be forced to accommodate all of the public without discrimination as to content.

My position is that either they do this, or we do everything necessary to destroy them, including using destructive force to wipe out their infrastructure.

We either destroy them, or they destroy us. If we do not stop this, we will be Jews in Cattle cars.

I'd rather see them burn than me and my family burn, and I don't want to hear any sophistry about their "rights" to violate constitutional freedom of speech.

[Jarhead9297]

The right to Constitutional free speech is to protect you against Government retaliation or retribution not a private company. I don’t like what they are doing either but I’ll also side with them against using the force of Government to compel a company to allow something it does not allow. Especially when the service is not required or Government sponsored.

It’s funny, we are for a baker to turn away a gay couple for his right to associate (which I agree with the baker) but are against a company wishing to operate as it chooses.

[semimojo]

We either destroy them, or they destroy us. If we do not stop this, we will be Jews in Cattle cars.

Silly hysteria aside, why do you think they've let Andy Ngo use their platform to collect $188K so far?