Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Me too. Well except I don't have a twatter account. Or snapdragon or gofish or instaBS etc., etc., etc.
1 posted on 07/11/2019 8:30:12 AM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rktman

What’s good for the Gander is Good for the g00se.


2 posted on 07/11/2019 8:32:13 AM PDT by left that other site (For America to have CONFIDENCE in our future, we must have PRIDE in our HISTORY... DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Good.

I’m glad to hear people handing back to the dems the very things they have been dishing out.

They would never stop until it came back to bite them.

We’ve been playing too nice for too long.


3 posted on 07/11/2019 8:32:45 AM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Can we sue twitter itself for blocking people from using it to talk to politicians?


4 posted on 07/11/2019 8:35:54 AM PDT by Crazieman (Civil war is near certain now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
OAC-Stupid-question
5 posted on 07/11/2019 8:38:45 AM PDT by SkyDancer ( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Pretty sure every single politician who has a Twitter account has blocked people. Time to sue them all! You know... this could lessen Twitter’s influence (which would be a good thing.)


6 posted on 07/11/2019 8:40:38 AM PDT by A_perfect_lady (FOX has flipped. I am breaking the FOX habit. I have OANN on my Bookmark Bar now. No more FOX.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

President Trump is not allowed to block people on his Twitter account, because the social-media page was used for “official purposes” and such a move would violate the First Amendment.

Attention everyone in Twitter Jail, this is your cue to SUE Twitter for Violating your First Amendment Rights, they are preventing you from engaging in protected speech with elected officials in direct contradiction to the Appeals Court ruling.


7 posted on 07/11/2019 8:43:39 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Wonder how this ruling will play out on Twitter and YouTube banning conservatives. This could be a good thing.


8 posted on 07/11/2019 8:45:28 AM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Excellent LMAO!


12 posted on 07/11/2019 9:29:56 AM PDT by melsec (There's a track, winding back, to an old forgotten shack along the road to Gundagai..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

SHE’S turned into a real petri dish for corruption and abuse of power.


14 posted on 07/11/2019 9:57:50 AM PDT by SMARTY ("Nobility is defined by the demands it makes on us - by obligations, not by rights".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

So why is Trump constrained by this but I could block people? Why 2 rules?


15 posted on 07/11/2019 11:36:18 AM PDT by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson