Properly understood, this brief is a tremendous insult to the Court. The number of amici briefs and the anonymity of the donors supporting such briefs should be entirely irrelevant to the Court. Only the legal arguments should have weight.
do they even have a legal argument? It seems their argument is “The SC doesn’t vote exactly as we like, therefore we demand it be changed” and to ‘support’ this non argument, they say “The court is sick and everyone knows it” Without providing any actual proof that ‘Everyone” thinks it