Can’t believe I’m glad he lost.
What the heck?
So mittens has come out for global warming. He’s now willing to prove to the liberals and media that he is liberal on global warming.
Is this new stance going to gain him support among the liberals and media?
Why? Why even go there?
“and human activity is a significant contributor.”
Then quit blowing hot air.
So nice having a real president instead of having to choose between a Marxist and a baboon.
FU Mutt. What a scumbucket sleaze bag. I am sure your bachelors of english, and your masters of business administration make you way more qualified to pontificate on this subject than my measely math and engineering degrees plus experience in fluid mechanics, thermodynamics, ocean cycles including a 25 year obsession studying the subject including natural history. It is amazing how many previous weather events were much more extreme even in the not so distant past.
But I am sure many of your pals are heavily invested in “green” energy and were expecting to leech off the free taxpayer subsidy machine for a long time. I am willing to bet your own portfolio has been impacted. I am old enough to know every single issue is always about the apportionment of dollars. Everything is always about money, which is why you hate Trump so much. He threatens your free money fountain. Remember Enron? That was about carbon credits with the expectation that congress would mandate and subsidize them. What happened when the bill failed?
Every time Mittens opens his mouth he confirms my opinion that he wouldn’t have been any better choice for President than the turd.
You’re not alone
Anyone that states a claim is on the hook to provide the metrics to prove that those statements can withstand cross-examination in a court of law. Otherwise general, sweeping statements are nothing but conjecture and most likely hearsay.