Posted on 10/06/2019 5:37:44 AM PDT by mplc51
Zaid tells ABC News' Chief Anchor George Stephanopoulos that the second person -- also described as an intelligence official -- has first-hand knowledge of some of the allegations outlined in the original complaint and has been interviewed by the head of the intelligence community's internal watchdog office, Michael Atkinson.
(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...
The spooks have about as much credibility as Adam Shiff and Nancy Pants.
Deep State Part Two - So Orchestrated it is past contrived.
The CIA is becoming an NGO. It seems almost like that is what they want.
Of course the DemonicRats had a stable full of whistleblowers lined up to parade out in waves, for effect.
Another IC employee who doesn’t like Trump?
Color me shocked !
More insider knowledge about a legitimate and legal conversation!!? Jail these assholes for dereliction of duty.
Not to mention Ukraine said there was no “there” there
I’m getting embarrassed at our banana republic govt works.
All of these people should be arrested.
“...Of course the DemonicRats had a stable full of whistleblowers lined up to parade out in waves, for effect.....”
Oh, yes. Of course. The whole DNC and all their communist constituents.
It doesn’t matter IF they ALL came out at this point....ZERO CREDIBILITY.
The People are beginning to see it for what it really is.
1st one failed. Bring in the bull pen....lol
So this “ whistleblower” is related to the same phone conversation that has already been released and found to be harmless. What happened to the alleged IRS whistleblower? Or was that just as fake?
Having first-hand knowledge of a call that was completely legal, makes no difference. The second-hand knowledge whistleblower was not going to be able to make the case against Trump, so Schiff and company scrambled to find somebody with ‘fird-hand’ knowledge. Unless any one of them can prove wrongdoing with the call, they’ll both blow Schiff’s chances for a coup against Trump.
Second-hand/first-hand: unless they can fabricate and prove something different from what’s in the call transcript, it’s game over for Schiff.
If the complaint was firsthand, would that cure the deficiency?
Nope. Regardless of that aspect, the subject matter is out of CIA IG, ICIG, and every other of the 20 some IGs in the federal government. Each is charged with rooting out corruption in their own department or agency. None is tasked with oversight of the president.
Big black eye for CIA, the House. If, and this is a thing that will never happen, if the CIA or the House or the press was honest. None of them is honest. All of them are taking advantage of a gullible public.
This is likely the one from the inside who leaked it to the original WB and is now trying to use WB protection to keep from being exposed for leaking classified information
Is it time yet? The Left won’t stop until there is blood in the streets and coup plotters are hanged.
He has first-hand knowledge of something someone heard.
Guess we need the script to keep these traitors lined up so we know which is which. Where is that IRS whistleblower anyway?
Whistlesucker?
The TWO whistleblowers MUST BE intricately tied together and "B" probably is the source for "A".
I think it's the Taylor guy. He was trying to put words in Volker's mouth and Volker shut him down.
And I'm betting the WB "A" is not going to testify unless he gets immunity.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.