Posted on 10/14/2019 8:58:54 AM PDT by jazusamo
The real leaker reports to Former president Obama and Hillary Clinton along with Valerie Jarrett. We all know it. Nobody wants to say it because we know they won’t be prosecuted no matter what they’ve done.
All along, the Dems were going after obstruction based on the Mueller report. Pretty hard to obstruct a false charge. It's called defending oneself.
In the meantime, the Dems were constructing the Whistleblowers complaint.
IIRC, we still don't know when the Whistle Blower "met with", "conspired with" sought advice" from Schiff's people.
Just give us a name and a date.
We know absolutely that BOTH Schiff and the Whistle Blower lied about their meeting BEFORE the complaint was filed.
No doubt. But who’s whistle...
Is it possible that the so-called whistleblower committed perjury in filing his claim? Perhaps he never, in fact, heard anybody say the things he claimed to have heard.
If so, then we are looking at a conspiracy as provable as any other.
I would rather see the fan hit this pathetic and dishonest traitor.
"Declaration (required per the California Whistleblower Protection Act)
I swear under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the facts set forth in the statement of the complaint, and in any supporting information submitted with the complaint, are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I agree to cooperate in any investigation of this matter and declare that I have read, understand, and will comply with the confidentiality requirements stated above. "
Hey, this whole thing could turn out to be great fun!
“...written by Lawfare attorneys...”
Without a doubt.
There was a single lead attorney handling both cases that arose ostensibly from the death of CIA asset “Loretta Fuddy.” (That Fuddy did not actually die the day of the crash (12/11/13) should tell us something of the depths of Barry’s depravity and his desire for election fraud.)
Team Barry (including Brennan) saw to the engine manufacturer being sued by two different plaintiffs, despite the fact that they had corrupt knowledge that the ditched aircraft’s engine did not fail. The corrupted NTSB wrote a report filled with falsehoods. The NTSB, FAA, CIA, USCG and Navy were involved with falsified evidence that would only seem to support the evidence before the court. (Both cases were settled essentially simultaneously through negotiation.)
IMHO, there was undeniable collusion between the attorneys and clients involved in both suits. I would suggest there was clear corruption and criminality there, too, but in this case, it seems to me “collusion” is simply the not-yet-tainted version of the phrase “criminal conspiracy.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.