But Gabbard is also a hypocrite. She’s called for Trump being investigated for the same Clinton/DNC Russia dossier bullshit that Clinton and the Democratic establishment are now pointing at her
Yes I get that she is the most attractive (physically and politically) candidate among the Dems -- but given some of the Freeper love she gets, one wonders how some even on these forums may vote in a farfetched Tulsi vs. Trump matchup!
mm hmm!
NOT COOL! Yang and Tulsi may ultimately sabotage Trump among libertarian/moderate/ and swing voters.
(But provided neither of them become the nominee or VP candidate, they can only help Trump as they expose the farce the Democratic Party really is.)
“But Gabbard is also a hypocrite.”
One would hope now that Tulsi has been accused by Clinton, she would come to the realization that maybe, just maybe, POTUS was falsely accused (too). For her to say that would require integrity and knowing that she would never get her party’s nomination. Though she won’t get it anyway.
The real (news) story here is the Clinton modus operandi seems to be using false stories about Russia against people. Obama had this thing about using the government to spy on people (Merkel, US Senators, news reporters, Tea Party, ... Trump’s campaign). He and the Clinton’s worked together against Trump. He has been very quiet about the Ukraine.
Gabbard called for President Trump to be investigated, not to be impeached. She’s keeping in Constitutional.