My use of the term “Illegal” is a reference to my anology a check being processed by a bank AFTER the bank has been notified that they he check it self was written under duress and is unsigned. Furthermore, If a bank knowing processes a check that is unsigned and written under duress especially when that check is accompanied by a signed letter to the bank demanding that the unsigned check be ignored and NOT cashed.
I believe that a bank who knowing and willing cashes an unsigned check is committing a crime/theft from the check writter. If the paraliment believe THEY have check writing authority they CAN sign their own letter to EU ?
aha.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3787589/posts?page=13#13
you only mentioned “illegitimate” in response #13, not “illegal.” In any case, I totally missed it (probably skimming way too fast in an attempt to keep up with all of the news and discussion).
labour appears to be using the term differently, which might then result in some confusion or at least draw attention to the need for some clarification of usage of the term. maybe.
This isn’t a bank case - the EU will simply say “You didn’t sign this, you can now talk to the people who put you in power, the British parliament and sort it out.”