Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Throws Out Michigan Gerrymandering Ruling in Win for GOP
Nationl Review ^ | 10 21 2019 | Mairead McArdle

Posted on 10/21/2019 10:45:20 AM PDT by yesthatjallen

The Supreme Court granted the Michigan Republican party a win on Monday by throwing out a lower court ruling that required dozens of congressional and legislative districts to be redrawn due to concerns they had been gerrymandered by Republicans.

The high court’s 5-to-4 decision reverses a ruling by the Sixth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati, which demanded the state redraw nine congressional districts and 25 state districts by August 1.

Monday’s decision also follows the Supreme Court’s ruling in June that it would leave gerrymandering cases to state courts.

“Partisan gerrymandering claims present political questions beyond the reach of the federal courts,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the June decision, which dealt with district boundaries in Maryland and North Carolina.

That ruling divided the court along ideological lines with Roberts serving as the swing vote.

Roberts joined conservative Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch to strike down the lower court’s ruling, while liberal Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagen, and Stephen Breyer voted to preserve the lower court’s finding that the districts must be redrawn.

SNIP

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: gerrymandering; michigan; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 10/21/2019 10:45:20 AM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s still kicking, eh?


2 posted on 10/21/2019 10:48:25 AM PDT by Magnum44 (My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44

“Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s still kicking, eh?”

It’s galvanic, they have her attached to a battery


3 posted on 10/21/2019 10:50:07 AM PDT by Fai Mao (There is no rule of law in the US until The PIAPS is executed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Can’t wait for RGB to slip on that figurative banana peel...


4 posted on 10/21/2019 10:50:19 AM PDT by farming pharmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

“districts will not be redrawn until 2022, when a bipartisan redistricting commission resulting from a state referendum last fall will assume the task of redrawing the boundaries.”

Bipartisan commission means Dem controlled as so called “independents” are included.


5 posted on 10/21/2019 10:52:09 AM PDT by where's_the_Outrage? (Drain the Swamp. Build the Wall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

F yeah


6 posted on 10/21/2019 10:52:27 AM PDT by max americana (Fired ONE libtard at work at every election since 2008 because I enjoy it. I hope every lib die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44
Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s still kicking, eh?

Unless Elijah Cummings' staff is forging her signature, too.

-PJ

7 posted on 10/21/2019 10:52:32 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (Freedom of the press is the People's right to publish, not CNN's right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

HUGE WIN


8 posted on 10/21/2019 10:54:00 AM PDT by Conserv ( b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

5/4? It should have been 9/0. There truly are four activist judges on that panel. The federal government has no say in how the lines in each state are drawn. i.e. the SCOTUS has no say.


9 posted on 10/21/2019 10:54:06 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The political war playing out in every country now: Globalists vs Nationalists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
districts will not be redrawn until 2022, when a bipartisan redistricting commission resulting from a state referendum last fall will assume the task of redrawing the boundaries.

Bipartisan commission means Dem controlled as so called “independents” are included.


More fallout from our 2018 pot head vote.
10 posted on 10/21/2019 10:54:43 AM PDT by farming pharmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

“....liberal Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagen, and Stephen Breyer voted to preserve the lower court’s finding that the districts must be redrawn....”

What the libs voted for is the potential redistricting IMPACT — not the redistricting itself. Just being realistic...


11 posted on 10/21/2019 10:56:05 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

John Roberts came through, in this case anyway.


12 posted on 10/21/2019 10:57:56 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Could today be the day Ruth Buzzi Ginsburg slips on a banana peel?


13 posted on 10/21/2019 10:59:07 AM PDT by SharpRightTurn (Chuck Schumer--giving pond scum everywhere a bad name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: akalinin

“Can’t wait for RGB to slip on that figurative banana peel...”

Read your post after composing my own, akalinin. Definitely on the same wavelength.


14 posted on 10/21/2019 11:01:40 AM PDT by SharpRightTurn (Chuck Schumer--giving pond scum everywhere a bad name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

That’s good news for here in NC too.


15 posted on 10/21/2019 11:04:41 AM PDT by Harpotoo (Being a socialist is a lot easier than having to WORK like the rest of US:-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

This was 100% expected after the Court’s decision in June regarding partisan gerrymandering. Just a bit of housecleaning on the Court’s part via its order list and no new opinions were handed down.


16 posted on 10/21/2019 11:05:45 AM PDT by Stravinsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
Weird. I went to the Supreme Court website to take a look at the opinion, and nothing for 2019 is showing up. Link is HERE. Is anyone else getting the same thing? Looking at the 2018 term returns results.
17 posted on 10/21/2019 11:05:55 AM PDT by zeugma (I sure wish I lived in a country where the rule of law actually applied to those in power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Gerrymandering can be good or bad.

Good if it’s done the right way.

Bad if it’s done the LEFT way..................


18 posted on 10/21/2019 11:06:44 AM PDT by Red Badger (Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain...................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
397e5c99f6c78e2ea119
19 posted on 10/21/2019 11:07:45 AM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
Bipartisan commission means Dem controlled as so called “independents” are included.

Bingo

20 posted on 10/21/2019 11:11:13 AM PDT by RckyRaCoCo (Please Pray For My Brother Ken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson