Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stand Strong on Flavor Ban to Protect America’s Youth
Townhall.com ^ | October 26, 2019 | Chad Connelly

Posted on 10/26/2019 4:29:34 AM PDT by Kaslin

Recently, the Trump administration took the laudable step of announcing a proposed ban on all flavored e-cigarettes in the United States. Recognizing that we are in the midst of a youth vaping epidemic, as well as the sudden explosion of vaping-related lung illnesses and deaths, the president rightly sprung into action. Flavors are a gateway to vaping, addiction, illness and even death, and by removing them from the market, we can take a serious bite out of this tragic crisis.

Predictably, vaping giant Juul, who is more than one-third owned by tobacco giant Altria, is quietly trying to chip away at the flavor ban to protect its own profits. Juul notably took pre-emptive action last week to stop selling its flavored vapor pods online. Notably, this action excludes “menthol-based” products, which includes mint and traditional menthol. 

Now, the rumor mill in Washington suggests that the administration may relent and carve these flavors out of the federal regulation, clearly as a result of Big Tobacco’s pressure campaign.

If this were to happen, it would completely undermine the purpose of the flavor ban. Mint is every bit as much a flavor as mango or cotton candy. Stand at any gas station counter and watch the Juul flavors kids are buying. 

The only people suggesting that mint is not a flavor, apparently, are Big Tobacco lobbyists, who have been upping their lobbying game to keep these flavors on the market. In fact, in 2018, Juul spent $1.6 million on lobbying to fight the FDA, and that number is only increasing; from April-June 2019 alone Juul spent $1.01 million – its most expensive quarter to date – to protect these flavors. 

In fact, mint and menthol aren’t just flavors – they’re the flavors young people most prefer. So far this year, they have accounted for two-thirds of youth use

They’re also highly profitable for Juul – to the tune of $2 billion annually and 70 percent of the company’s total sales. This is an existential issue for Juul, hence the quiet lobbying campaign.

So, we have a situation where the 800-pound gorilla in the e-cigarette market is pushing to reinstate the flavors most popular with youth and most profitable to its own bottom line. Yet the company claims to be a partner with the government in combating youth use. Who on earth could believe them? Is the cynical public relations move of preemptively ending sales of non-mint and menthol vapor supposed to convince us of anything? Why in the world would we trust their PR efforts at all?

Earlier this month, a number of conservative organizations released a letter supporting the president’s proposed flavor ban. In it, they wrote, “Until e-cigarette companies are willing to abide by current restrictions on youth sales and further research is conducted by the CDC and FDA regarding the health consequences associated with e-cigarettes/vaping, we approve of the Trump Administration’s decision to halt flavored e-cigarettes to protect consumers, particularly youth.”

The goal is obvious, and stated at the end of that passage: Protect consumers, particularly youth. The objective of Juul and Big Tobacco is also obvious: Protect profits, period. The Trump administration should not be duped by this shameless ploy to pad e-cigarette company profits. The Administration must stand strong, and commit to a true, all-encompassing flavor ban that protects young people. 


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: bigbrother; fascism; vaping; wombtothetomb; worhipthestate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

1 posted on 10/26/2019 4:29:34 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

And in the same veign, let’s all get behind that Government push to get rid of red meat, and ration salt.

Because all of those things are the same.


2 posted on 10/26/2019 4:32:34 AM PDT by MrEdd (Caveat Emptors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I think it’s great that the Trump administration is doing this for us. People shouldn’t be allowed to buy things that might be harmful.


3 posted on 10/26/2019 4:34:17 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Down with the ChiComs! Independence for Hong Kong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Vaping is only harmful when people (primarily teenagers and 20somethings) use bootleg THC with the commercial cartridges.


4 posted on 10/26/2019 4:40:22 AM PDT by WesG (Without geometry, life is pointless.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Juul’s ‘flavors’ suck. Touch my Vuse Solo, I’ll cut your fingers off at the elbow. I also have an e-pipe that looks just like your grandaddys briar pipe, and need to smoke it more. Now, there’s satisfaction when you puff on an old-fashioned crook-necked pipe and the juice is a combination of flavors of golden Virginia tobacco, whiskey, and red apple.


5 posted on 10/26/2019 4:40:36 AM PDT by Viking2002 (WARNING: Eating too much oatmeal can make you look like Wilford Brimley.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The same filthy Party that wants to set up “injection rooms” where junkies can shoot heroin and God-knows-what-else want to ban e-cigarettes.
6 posted on 10/26/2019 4:40:48 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (A joke: Brennan,Comey and Lynch walk into a Barr...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Earlier this month, a number of conservative nanny state organizations released a letter supporting the president’s proposed flavor ban.
7 posted on 10/26/2019 4:40:54 AM PDT by SanchoP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I’m glad the fed is making this decision for me. I don’t have to think about as many things. /s


8 posted on 10/26/2019 4:45:11 AM PDT by MV=PY (The Magic Question: Who's paying for it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WesG

It’s true that the recent serious illnesses and deaths have been closely correlate with the use of non-commercial, THC-based products.

However, that’s not the same as proving that this is the only circumstance in which vaping can be harmful. It’s a fairly new technology, and we don’t know anything about potential long-term health complications, or the extent to which vaping might increase rather than decrease tobacco or marijuana use in the long run.

Please note that my original post was intended as sarcasm. I know it’s hard to tell these days. Even professional satirists get caught simply describing reality.


9 posted on 10/26/2019 4:46:20 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Down with the ChiComs! Independence for Hong Kong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WesG; Tax-chick
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) finally confirmed that the vast majority of patients with vaping-related respiratory illnesses have reported using cannabis products, typically purchased on the black market.
10 posted on 10/26/2019 4:49:10 AM PDT by DoodleBob (Gravity's waiting period is about 9.8 m/s^s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WesG

Exactly.

Vaping is not the health issue. Tobacco is far worse and vaping provides an alternative.

This is another area where the federal gov’t should not be involved.


11 posted on 10/26/2019 4:51:37 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (The Democratic Party is now a hate-group)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Then I will make my own.

This applies to banning “Sault weapons” too.


12 posted on 10/26/2019 4:56:24 AM PDT by Hugh the Scot (I won`t be wronged. I won`t be insulted. I won`t be laid a hand on. - John Bernard Books)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Yeah, go back to cigarettes that are safer.


13 posted on 10/26/2019 5:05:00 AM PDT by SkyDancer ( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Yep.
Better raid liquor stores nationwide.
Nobody needs bubblegum flavored vodka.


14 posted on 10/26/2019 5:07:02 AM PDT by RandallFlagg (Fact: Gun control laws kill innocents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

Eeeeeeeeew. That’s just WRONG.


15 posted on 10/26/2019 5:08:04 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Down with the ChiComs! Independence for Hong Kong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If we’re doing away with things because they are harmful to youths (which should not be available to them anyway...), what do we do about alcohol and sex?


16 posted on 10/26/2019 5:08:31 AM PDT by jeffc (The U.S. media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Remember, vaping was a government solution to cigarette smoking.

Now we have kids smoking and vaping....and the numbers are snowballing.

17 posted on 10/26/2019 5:09:39 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeffc

Would it be “laudable” - the author’s word - if the Trump administration noticed that sexual immorality has a lot of negative individual and societal outcomes and decided to do something about it?


18 posted on 10/26/2019 5:12:49 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Down with the ChiComs! Independence for Hong Kong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

“And in the same veign (mean “vein”?), let’s all get behind that Government push to get rid of red meat, and ration salt.

Because all of those things are the same.”

Not so - vaping flavors is like giving Fentanyl a variety of nice flavors....or allowing pedophiles to use candy as a lure.


19 posted on 10/26/2019 5:16:49 AM PDT by trebb (Don't howl about illegal leeches, or Trump in general, while not donating to FR - it's hypocritical.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It’s not a conservative value to turn kids into addicts.


20 posted on 10/26/2019 5:20:01 AM PDT by Drango (1776 = 2020)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson