Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chimera

Good example. Similarly, during the Florida 2000 recount, the Democrats protracted the process so that new ballots for Gore could gradually be inserted during the recount through one pretext or another. As that fell short for the Dems, Florida’s judges got involved, with a divided Florida Supreme Court wanting to conduct a statewide recount. Mercifully, the US Supreme Court intervened to stop that.


33 posted on 11/06/2019 3:36:15 AM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Rockingham
One of the very rare cases where our candidate came out ahead in a recount of a close race. And look what it took to get that. Not only going to the USSC to finally have someone say the election officials had to follow the rules on the books and not make up new ones as they went along, but our people had to literally pound on the doors just to be allowed to observe the process. Contrast that with what Schiff is doing with his Star Chamber and double-speak (”Sure, we let the Republicans ask questions, I just won't let the witness answer them.”) Donald Trump will never be allowed to face his accuser(s) in an open and fair process. Secret trials, legal proceedings behind closed doors, no chance to confront your accuser. Doesn't sound like the America I grew up with.
37 posted on 11/06/2019 4:39:44 AM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson