Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dems finally got something they can use for impeachment
NY Post ^ | November 20 2019 | Michael Goodwin

Posted on 11/20/2019 11:37:59 PM PST by knighthawk

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: jerod

I don’t believe that the assumption that because Slow Creepy Uncle Joe is running for President he can’t be investigated is true.

Show me the law.

The dims have had an investigation running on Trump since the day he came down the escalator and declared.


21 posted on 11/21/2019 3:32:32 AM PST by Lakeside Granny ( God's Word says, "Before I formed you in the womb I knew you..." Jeremiah 1:5))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jerod

The great thing about this very expensive goofiness is the way it has pulled Republican voters together. This time around, President Trump can count on at somewhere in the neighborhood of 90% of registered Republicans turning out for him. We’ll crawl over cut glass.

And because Trump is Trump, there will be a *lot* of protection around this election that you won’t see or even know about. (Yeah, it’ll be the Russian mafia).

The other bright spot is that ScatFranNan’s imbeciles have left themselves with absolutely nothing to run on. There will be no impeachment and removal. America doesn’t want that. They love the economy. Dems have gotten *nothing* done.

What is the dem record on which they will run? I’ll wait.

The President, otoh, can rattle off a list of accomplishments for at least an hour.


22 posted on 11/21/2019 3:48:44 AM PST by jazminerose (Adorable Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

The Fox News daytime crowd were out in force yesterday crowing about how damaging this was to trump. Carl Rove saying the Republican senators would be marching up to the White House to tell Trump to resign. All this before the afternoon cross examination by Republicans on the committee even started.


23 posted on 11/21/2019 3:55:56 AM PST by Russ (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joma89
"Just remember folks, humans used to routinely use warfare (i.e. Killing and breaking things) to settle political disputes. As ugly and stupid as this is, it could be much worse."

It needs to be much worse. Schiff and the rest of the coup plotters need to face justice. If the US government cannot or will not do it, then it is time to have a time of great tribulation and see who comes out the other side.

24 posted on 11/21/2019 3:57:21 AM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: gunsequalfreedom

did you read it?? he was mocking the rats...


25 posted on 11/21/2019 4:07:54 AM PST by God luvs America (63.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jerod

I have wondered for months why Barr didn’t appoint a special prosecutor (”SP”) for the quid-pro-quo-red-eye-gaffe-prone Joe Biden-Ukrainian affair. This would have shielded POTUS and helped the country immensely. In addition boxed in fanatically demokraps who couldn’t interfere in an ongoing investigation and who would be forced to now attack the “out of control” office of the SP that they sanctimoniously defended for the past 2 yrs during their Mueller hoax). POTUS would be free, hands off - let the cards fall where they may except he would not criticize the SP, and remind everyione that he agrees with Peloser w/ regards that no one is above the law ... not even Joe Biden.


26 posted on 11/21/2019 4:11:16 AM PST by Susquehanna Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 867V309
15977753-10154797511010729-2838312669380473771-n
27 posted on 11/21/2019 4:26:06 AM PST by SkyDancer ( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jerod

The glitch in your scenario (IMO) is Pelosi and the DNC have no say in what the President of Ukraine does or doesn’t do. If Trump wants him to investigate he will because as Sondland testified yesterday, Zelinski loves Trump. I’m pretty sure it is being done now because the Bidens really did extort over $13 million from the Ukranian people.


28 posted on 11/21/2019 4:27:36 AM PST by New Jersey Realist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

In the end, I think we find out this was another Brennan/CIA Op. The CIA was running goofballs like Vindman at the Administration with words and ideas that seem impeachable like QPQ, conditions on the aid, “what do you want for a meeting”, etc. They were trying to bait Trump into creating evidence for his own impeachment.

Why do I think that? Think about the quote from Sondland that Trump read. Sondland said Trump was in a bad mood and said: “I want nothing. I want nothing. No quid pro quo. Tell Zelensky to do the right thing. Tell him to do what he ran on.”

1) Trump was likely grouchy because he was tired of their running dirt at him. May have even tipped Trump off. Maybe Trump enhanced the bait or fed them a Barium meal. He did warn them they would regret going down this road.
2) Why would Trump use their words? Like quid pro quo. I’ve never heard him say that before. Strongly suggests he was repeating their words back to them to me.
3) Zelensky ran on ending corruption. That’s all Trump wanted.
4) Some guys like Morrison were completely cut out of the loop. Why? Known loyal to Trump?


29 posted on 11/21/2019 4:32:29 AM PST by IamConservative (I was nervous like the third chimp in line for the Ark after the rain started.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IamConservative

In the end, I think we find out this was another Brennan/CIA Op. The CIA was running goofballs like Vindman at the Administration with words and ideas that seem impeachable like QPQ, conditions on the aid, “what do you want for a meeting”, etc. They were trying to bait Trump into creating evidence for his own impeachment.

Why do I think that? Think about the quote from Sondland that Trump read. Sondland said Trump was in a bad mood and said: “I want nothing. I want nothing. No quid pro quo. Tell Zelensky to do the right thing. Tell him to do what he ran on.”

Bingo. I thought the same thing.

These ‘enemy agents’ in the Whitehouse are Crossfire Hurricane operatives looking for a way to entrap the President in some illegal action.


30 posted on 11/21/2019 4:51:23 AM PST by Flick Lives (MSM, the Enemy of the People since 1898)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: jerod

>> But the essential purpose of this fiasco is stop the Ukrainians from investigating the Biden’s.

Too late apparently. While not directly named in the indictment, it’s clear this would likely have significant blowback for Hunter and Joe.

Joe Biden’s son and his partners received $16.5 million from Burisma — Ukrainian MP
https://tass.com/world/1090971

KIEV, November 20. /TASS/. The Ukrainian Office of the Prosecutor General has drawn up an indictment against the owner of the Burisma Holdings energy company, ex-Ecology Minister Nikolai Zlochevsky, that contains information that the son of former US Vice President Joe Biden, Hunter, as a Burisma board member along with his partners received $16.5 million for their services, Ukrainian Verkhovna Rada MP from the ruling Servant of the People party Alexander Dubinsky told a press conference on Wednesday, citing the investigation’s materials. According to him, the money came from duplicitous criminal activity.

“Zlochevsky was charged with this new accusation by the Office of the Prosecutor General but the press ignored it,” the MP said. “It was issued on November 14.”

The U.S. press is ignoring this as well. Of course.

Another foreign source on this:

Biden, partners receive $16.5 mln in payments stolen from Ukraine – MP Derkach
https://en.interfax.com.ua/news/press-conference/625876.html

An important document in this would be the formal treaty:

TREATY WITH UKRAINE ON MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS
https://www.congress.gov/106/cdoc/tdoc16/CDOC-106tdoc16.pdf

Thanks Billy Jeff!

It will be interesting to see this play out.


31 posted on 11/21/2019 4:51:37 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

Not over yet. They must have a dozen hystericals on tap, ready to be called (and paid) to testify that Trump pinched them on the a$$ in 1987.

The dems know that “impeachment” ain’t going nowhere. All this is about the election. They’re showing the testimony now on TV, and it doesn’t cost them anything. Later, during the election campaign, they will refer back to the testimony.


32 posted on 11/21/2019 5:19:40 AM PST by I want the USA back (The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it. Orwell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

Once in a while Schiff’s right eye wanders toward his nose. I wonder if that’s a nervous reaction to something being said.


33 posted on 11/21/2019 5:35:40 AM PST by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

I was channel surfing and saw Schifface over the top with tingles down his leg and quickly hit the remote. Guessing that’s what his cringly tingles were about.


34 posted on 11/21/2019 6:13:33 AM PST by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

Yep, a dog and pony show in which only the left side of town is allowed to show off their prize dogs and ponies, while the right side of town is expected to show up and watch but not participate.

Pretty sure we all know how that will work out.


35 posted on 11/21/2019 6:19:26 AM PST by Boomer (Epstein didn't kill himself...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

“This is a seminal moment in our investigation.”

Yes it’s called FAIL loser award to ensue.


36 posted on 11/21/2019 6:53:17 AM PST by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America
did you read it?? he was mocking the rats...

Yes, I read it. But I missed it if that is what he was doing. And that would make sense. Thanks.

37 posted on 11/21/2019 9:20:24 AM PST by gunsequalfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Ken H; God luvs America

We may be missing the point. God luvs American has a different take.


38 posted on 11/21/2019 9:21:24 AM PST by gunsequalfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson