GOP Leader to Schiff – Committee Rule Must Allow Republicans Day to Call Witnesses (truc)

The Gateway Pundit ^ | November 21, 2019 | Jim Holt

[eartick]

This guy would make a great bobble head doll.

[wiseprince]

You’re crazy. Romney, Lisa, Collins won’t allow it. Collins needs to be primaried to force a little support. It’s worth it to defend the President

[eartick]

I see you left the year blank. Good thinking

[trebb]

Depends on what the meaning of “is” is...
Seems like a hearing to me.

[Labyrinthos]

They should call someone we haven’t heard from yet — like that Eric Ciaramella guy. I can imagine Schiff’s response: “You can’t call him. He’s the whistleblower whose name I do not know.”

Here's what I don't get: There is nothing illegal about disclosing the name of the so-called whistle-blower, and even if it is illegal, the Constitution protects members of Congress from prosecution for statement made under the dome while conducting official business. If Jordon and the other GOP committee members had any balls, one of them would have asked each witness the following:

Are you familiar with the name Eric Ciaramella?

How are you familar?

Have you ever communicated directly or indirectly with Eric Ciaramella?

Have you ever communicated directly or indirectly with Eric Ciaramella concerning Ukraine?

Have you ever communicated directly or indirectly with Eric Ciaramella concerning POTUS Trump's July 25 telephone call with... etc.

[ProtectOurFreedom]

Looks, smells, and acts like a hearing to me, too. Let’s see what the Grand Inquisitor has to say.

[Kharis13]

Some of my friends have laughed at me, but I believe Donald J. Trump was elected for a time such as this. God’s hand is on him. No one - NO ONE - else could’ve stood up under this constant avalanche of fake news.

[damper99]

Schiff ignored the letter. The hearings are closed. A big FU from Schiff/Pelosi to the GOP.

[pilgrim]

You have hit the nail on the head!

NO ONE, could have or would have.