Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gleeaikin

Why would thatbe true for the trial in the Senate and not for the impeachment in the House where the Dems controlled everything including the questionsvthevwitnesses could answer?


105 posted on 12/04/2019 1:08:29 AM PST by billyboy15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]


To: billyboy15; livius; All

The issue I was addressing was the White House claim that the House (and presumably also the Senate) could not subpoena employees and former employees to testify. The judge ruled that they could testify. The link below explains in some detail. There will likely be an appeal and at some point the Supremes might be involved.

https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2019-11-25/federal-judge-orders-don-mcgahn-comply-with-house-subpoena


113 posted on 12/04/2019 11:52:10 PM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson