In this article, three different top-ranked historians (Gordon Wood, Jim McPherson, James Oakes) are quoted as saying that the NYT 1619 Project is anti-historical.
1 posted on
12/03/2019 12:47:27 PM PST by
DeweyCA
To: DeweyCA
One who actually believes in socialism has already demonstrated that they are a few fries short of a happy meal. Why pursue further?
2 posted on
12/03/2019 12:52:02 PM PST by
Da Coyote
(is)
To: DeweyCA
3 posted on
12/03/2019 1:43:24 PM PST by
indthkr
To: DeweyCA
Well confirmation is good, but considering the source of the 1619 project, I had already determined that to be the case. 8>)
To: DeweyCA
"Get The Truth About Americas Founding From The World Socialists, Says
The RNC??
Read the article posted, still don't get how 'the RNC" is endorsing the 1619 Project
(Knocking on head)Somethings wrong here(Knocking on head again)
Or this article lost it's premise with the headline...
6 posted on
12/03/2019 2:23:13 PM PST by
RedMonqey
To: DeweyCA
Yeah read this today and immediately texted my borderline commie buddy, saying ahh so you guys are finally getting a clue lol. The socialists are actually considerably alarmed by racial identity politics, afraid that it has supplanted “class struggle’ for the left and endangers their plans for workers of all colors uniting to challenge capitalism. Politics can make for strange bedfellows sometimes. There was a piece in the American Conservative about this too.
8 posted on
12/03/2019 2:29:26 PM PST by
jimwatx
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson