re they really that bad?
They could improve their reputation, but I’ve noticed more and more that when I see a story like this that seems to finally nail the D’s, it turns out to be from GP, and I never hear or see anything from any other sources. So I’m very skeptical.
If it confirmed by other reliable sources, e.g. Conservative treehouse, etc., I’ll give GP the credit.
which fact do you dispute? That Rudy visited UKR? That Rudy tweeted? That NP moves ahead with impeachment? The article looks like facts to me...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
..”On Thursday Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced that Democrats will move ahead on impeachment of President Trump for not giving away US taxpayer dollars quick enough to one of the world’s most corrupt nations. Democrats believe this is grounds for impeachment...”
“Earlier this week Rudy Giuliani met with Ukrainian officials to discuss the misuse of US funds in Ukraine and the creation of a group to fight corruption in the country.
“..
..And now this…
On Friday Rudy Giuliani tweeted out a “Shocking Disclosure!”
According to Rudy’s sources — Much of the $5.3 billion in US Aid Ukraine reported as misused was given to the embassy’s favored NGO’s.
At the time Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch, witness for the Witchunt, was the Ambassador. That embassy directed the police not to investigate...
(see actual tweets.)
It was also posted on Buzzfeed. And both articles quoted Rudy’s tweets. Are you saying Rudy’s tweets were made up?