I agree; Hillary is toast. Not only was she unpopular with swing voters, but the big donors handed her an election with 24/7/365 media control and she still lost. I can’t recall the last time I even saw her stand up; she’s done.
It doesn’t help that immediately after the 2016 election, a lot of libs shredded her as a horrible candidate; all those comments could be used against her. She just has to join Gore, Kerry, etc. in the losers’ circle - forever.
And hopefully, there will be some shoes to drop from the Durham investigation. Hillary was behind the Steele Dossier and the Russia hoax. We also have more information on her emails than was available in 2016. A target rich environment.
It’s gonna be the wookie.
This is too sensible to deny. Hillary: she couldn't, she can't.
As to Michelle Obama, somebody's wife as a last-minute switch is not unknown but it won't go over well on the presidential level. She'd be a token of her husband and a puppet of the Deep State. Right now she's rich and famous and living it up. Case closed.
I believe (subject to change!) the Dems know they are going to lose unless they can crash the economy and/or destroy DJT. They know it, therefore it doesn't matter who steps up to lose. But by November, something might go their way and then they need the most unobjectionable candidate. That is Biden. He can sway a few more voters where it counts (Rust Belt), as socialists cannot. Besides, he's so old, he's disposable, whereas Warren is still young enough to run again. And she's not all that popular. True, Biden has a lot of baggage (yet to be unpacked), but he's a better liar than Warren. Plus he'll take whatever running mate they tell him to take.
In the end, Trump has a 90+ percent chance of winning and will probably have it on Super Tuesday, so they'll play their deuce. Old Cracked Joe.