I honestly don’t think either side is considering her at all; she is damaged goods, with little support. As libs conceded after the 2016 race, Trump had a message (”Make America Great Again”), while her campaign was a cheerless “I’m not Trump” rant. She had no real message then, and now has no credibility to spread one.
Jill Stein’s votes would have put her over the top, but too many libs just couldn’t pull a lever for Hillary.
Gary Johnson, Libertarian, received 3.3% of the national vote compared to Stein’s 1%. And NeverTrumper French received .5% of the vote.
Johnson received 3 million more votes than Stein. Don’t buy the Stein impact on the election. Who is to say the Stein voters would have voted for Hillary if Stein was not in the race or if they would have voted at all? Using similar logic, Johnson hurt Trump more than Stein hurt Hillary.