Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Blocks Trump's Executive Order Allowing Local Officials To Reject Refugees
NPR ^ | January 15, 2020 | Bobby Allyn

Posted on 01/20/2020 3:37:28 PM PST by kiryandil

A federal judge in Maryland has blocked the Trump administration's executive order allowing state and local governments to turn away refugees from resettling in their communities.

In September, President Trump announced that groups that help refugees find places to live must first get written consent from local and state jurisdictions before resettling them.

Immigration advocates challenged the executive order in federal court, calling it cruel and shortsighted.

U.S. District Judge Peter Messitte said the executive order "does not appear to serve the overall public interest."

In his 31-page opinion issued Wednesday, he wrote that the order gives states and local governments "the power to veto where refugees may be resettled — in the face of clear statutory text and structure, purpose Congressional intent, executive practice, judicial holdings and Congressional doctrine to the contrary."

Messitte's ruling is a preliminary injunction, putting on hold enforcement of Trump's refugee resettlement order.

The White House press office released a statement that said, "This is a preposterous ruling, one more example of nationwide district court injunctions run amok, and we are expeditiously reviewing all options to protect our communities and preserve the integrity of the refugee resettlement process..."

(Excerpt) Read more at npr.org ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: 4thcircuit; fourthcircuit; judiciary; petermessitte; politicaljudiciary; rapinbilljudge; refugeeresettlement; resistancejudge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last
Another partisan Democrat Federal judge-president in a minor Federal district court [District of Maryland/Fourth Circuit] overrules the ACTUAL President.

And the beat goes on.

1 posted on 01/20/2020 3:37:28 PM PST by kiryandil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

This old gasbag "judge" is a Rapin Bill judge who fancies himself to be part of The Resistance.

He's the one who denied President Trump's motion to dismiss a lawsuit brought by Maryland and the District of Columbia for his alleged violation of the emoluments clauses of the U.S. Constitution, and then got smacked down hard by his own Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals.

2 posted on 01/20/2020 3:39:52 PM PST by kiryandil (Chris Wallace: Because someone has to drive the Clown Car)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

The black robes learn how to be gods during their three years of law school.


3 posted on 01/20/2020 3:40:26 PM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

I guess the District court judges in San Francisco and Honolulu must have had the day off. Nice to see there are back up hacks available as needed


4 posted on 01/20/2020 3:41:40 PM PST by j.havenfarm ( Beginning my 20th year on FR! 2,500+ replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

But local governments can declare sanctuary cities and defy federal law a will.

These people are joke to put it mildly.


5 posted on 01/20/2020 3:42:55 PM PST by desertfreedom765
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: j.havenfarm

I predict that The Supreme Court Banhammer is coming down on these perfumed little bench princes & princesses after the “two scoops Peach Mint” goes away, and President Trump gets re-elected this fall.


6 posted on 01/20/2020 3:44:58 PM PST by kiryandil (Chris Wallace: Because someone has to drive the Clown Car)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

So the opinion of one piny judge as to what servws the public interest outweighs that of tens of millions of citizens?

This has got to stop.


7 posted on 01/20/2020 3:45:26 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

Another temporary stumbling block!
For now, but not forever.


8 posted on 01/20/2020 3:47:48 PM PST by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6
This one got beaten with his own lips over his ridiculous "emoluments" ruling last July:

On July 10, 2019, The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit overruled Judge Messitte, expressly finding he abused his discretion for refusing to certify an interlocutory appeal and further finding the plaintiffs lacked standing to pursue the underlying case.

The Court noted "Neither [Emoluments (foreign and domestic)] Clause expressly confers any rights on any person, nor does either Clause specify any remedy for a violation."

9 posted on 01/20/2020 3:47:53 PM PST by kiryandil (Chris Wallace: Because someone has to drive the Clown Car)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

Justice Clarence Thomas has stated he doesn’t think the judges rulings should have any effect outside their own jurisdiction. Take this to the USSC.


10 posted on 01/20/2020 3:48:13 PM PST by Dalberg-Acton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

“...clear statutory text and structure, purpose Congressional intent, executive practice, judicial holdings and Congressional doctrine to the contrary.”

Yeah, you’ve gotta really watch out for “purpose Congressional intent” while quoting “executive practice” to disallow executive practice. And that Congressional doctrine will surely get you!


11 posted on 01/20/2020 3:48:16 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

The Executive Branch is neutralized by the other two branches. Is that how it works now?


12 posted on 01/20/2020 3:49:43 PM PST by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

Uh, old news. 5 days old.


13 posted on 01/20/2020 3:50:01 PM PST by Okeydoker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

That’s not a Constitutionally-valid reason to block an Executive Order. The ruling will easily be overturned.


14 posted on 01/20/2020 3:50:27 PM PST by sourcery (Non Aquiesco: "I do not consent" (Latin))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

State and local government should be able to do whatever they want as long as it doesn’t conflict with the federal constitution.


15 posted on 01/20/2020 3:53:01 PM PST by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Okeydoker
Uh, old news. 5 days old.

Ok, post the link to your FR article on this, Mittbag.

16 posted on 01/20/2020 3:55:54 PM PST by kiryandil (Chris Wallace: Because someone has to drive the Clown Car)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

Another 80 year old Democrat Fascist Party Judge desperate to get his names in the History books before he croaks


17 posted on 01/20/2020 4:01:30 PM PST by MNJohnnie (They would have abandon leftism to achieve sanity. Freeper Olog-hai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

Some of us who read outside the bubble have read this story repeatedly over the last five days.

Now if you ONLY get your news inside the bubble you are guaranteed to be as ill informed as you apparently are. And then I guess you can wait for some poor soul to post five days old news, lest you never find out about anything going on the world.


18 posted on 01/20/2020 4:04:39 PM PST by Okeydoker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS


19 posted on 01/20/2020 4:04:53 PM PST by wastedyears (The left would kill every single one of us and our families if they knew they could get away with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Okeydoker

You’re not really lookin’ all that good in this exchange. Just sayin’.


20 posted on 01/20/2020 4:08:41 PM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson