Personally and I know I don’t count but I would like to see a subpoena issued for the “whistleblower” and everything put on hold - shut it all down - until he shows up as a witness for the defense! Why wouldn’t that have been done anyway? I might even settle for one of the defense attorneys SPEAKING HIS NAME in the trial!!! THAT might shut it all down!
Gads - we have to have some fun with this. Anyone watching what’s going on has to be nuts. I follow everything every day every year but this is more than I can take. It would be like watching the same movie 12 hours straight...and starting over on the same movie the next day.
Couple this with Laura Ingraham’s report last night, and there is no way this story has been “debunked” and “discredited.” According to Ingraham, who has supporting documents, in 2016 there were White House meetings with Ukrainian representatives over concerns that Hunter Biden’s role with Burisma was an obstacle to US-Ukrainian relations, and that prosecutors were looking into the matter. These meetings were arranged by the man believed to be the whistleblower.
The New York Times was investigating this in early 2019, but spiked the story days after Biden announced his candidacy. The story was being pursued by Vogel, the same person who had written the 2017 Politico story about Ukrainian support of the Hillary campaign.
This is worth repeating and if true it is a real bombshell!