Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

There’s plenty of anecdotal evidence that the death toll is higher than being said. There’s also a lot of evidence that there are a lot more people with the disease than is being said, which would drastically lower the mortality rate.

The Chinese are flipping out, and the numbers they give appear to be a shade above junk.

For those that have healed or died, the mortality rate from the official numbers has descended from about 65% to 40% in China.

But wait, the Chinese are reported to have been burning dead without testing them for the virus, so that mortality rate could be notably higher.

But wait, when the number with the disease was listed at 1100 and the dead to 41, we were seeing accounts that there were really about 95000 with the disease. That could drop the mortality rate to about 0.04%

But wait, we’ve seen that the Chinese have run out of med supplies, test kits, and have begun barricading people into their homes...which would mean that on one hand the mortality rate there is completely untranslatable to mortality rates there; and on the other hand, the Chinese are completely flipping out, so that suggests something much more serious than the common flu.

As it sits, the mortality rate, in China, appears to be somewhere between 0.04% and 60% or so.


15 posted on 02/03/2020 9:50:50 AM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lepton
As it sits, the mortality rate, in China, appears to be somewhere between 0.04% and 60% or so.

Isn't that the truth.
31 posted on 02/03/2020 12:44:05 PM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson