[Mouton]

I think this matter was under the USA in DC. I guess lying under oath if you are one of the insiders is OK there. I’d love to know whom and the breakdown by party of those on that grand jury. Obviously they could not get an indictment.

[Lurkinanloomin]

I don’t think they even tried to get an indictment.

[Engedi]

McCabe’s lawyer has said his story changed because in the first interview he wasn’t prepared for the question, and that he was soon distracted by President Trump’s firing of FBI chief James Comey, whom McCabe replaced as acting director.

Oh I see isn’t that what happened with Flynn, he wasn’t prepared for the question(s) and didn’t think he needed a lawyer.

Yeah, I see how this works.

[JohnBovenmyer]

A radio piece I heard on this also said the decision was by the US Atty for DC. Which I think would imply it is limited to this matter and that he's not out of risk by Durham. Although the MSM will doubtless spin it that way and whine loudly IF Durham actually does something against McCabe.

The selection bias of the DC jury pool is a problem in need of a solution, if we are using them to indict and try corruption by top Federal officials and their associates. The left will get off automatically, like this, and the right will get crucified automatically regardless of the evidence, cf. the perjurious Roger Stone jury forewoman.