Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DEA Will Return $82K Life Savings It Seized From an Elderly Pittsburgh Man and His Daughter
Reason ^ | 3.4.2020 | C.J. CIARAMELLA

Posted on 03/05/2020 11:14:10 AM PST by nickcarraway

Neither Terry Rolin or his daughter were ever charged with a crime, but that didn't stop the DEA from trying to seize more than $82,000 from them through civil asset forfeiture.

The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) will return more than $82,000 that it seized from an elderly Pittsburgh man and his daughter after a federal class-action lawsuit was filed on their behalf last month.

The Institute for Justice, the libertarian-leaning public interest law firm that filed the lawsuit, announced today that the DEA will return $82,373 that it seized from Rebecca Brown six months ago at a Pittsburgh airport. The money was the life savings of her father, Terry Rolin, a 79-year-old retired railroad engineer. She says she intended to deposit the money in a bank but ran out of time before her flight.

According to Brown, a DEA agent met her at her gate and grilled her about the money. Brown told The Washington Post that the agent demanded she put her confused father on the phone, and, when their stories didn't exactly match, the agent seized the cash.

"I'm grateful that my father's life savings will soon be returned, but the money never should have been taken in the first place. I can't believe they're not even offering an apology for the stress and pain they caused for my family," Brown said in a press release today. "Without this money, my father was forced to put off necessary dental work—causing him serious pain for several months—and could not make critical repairs to his truck."

In cases like Rolin's, the DEA seizes cash using civil asset forfeiture, a practice that allows police to seize cash and property suspected of being connected to criminal activity, even if the owner is not charged with a crime.

After the seizure, the DEA notified Brown that it was seeking to permanently forfeit Rolin's life savings. Neither Rolin or Brown were charged with a crime.

Law enforcement groups say civil asset forfeiture is a vital tool to disrupt organized drug trafficking by targeting its illicit revenues. However civil liberties groups say there are too few protections for innocent owners and too many perverse profit incentives for police. More than half of all U.S. states have passed some form of asset forfeiture reform because of these concerns, but it is less constrained at the federal level.

Although it is legal to fly domestically with large amounts of undeclared cash, the Institute for Justice lawsuit claims the DEA has a practice or policy of seizing currency from travelers at U.S. airports without probable cause simply if the dollar amount is greater than $5,000. This practice, the suit argues, violates travelers' Fourth Amendment rights.

"We are glad that Terry will get his money back, but it is shameful that it takes a lawsuit and an international outcry for the federal government to do the right thing," said Institute for Justice senior attorney Dan Alban. "We know that this routinely happens to other travelers at airports across the United States."

In 2016, a USA Today investigation found the DEA seized more than $209 million from at least 5,200 travelers in 15 major airports over the previous decade.

A 2017 report by the Justice Department Office of Inspector General found that the DEA seized more than $4 billion in cash from people suspected of drug activity over the previous decade, but $3.2 billion of those seizures were never connected to any criminal charges.

The report reviewed 100 cash seizures and found that only 44 of those were connected to or advanced a criminal investigation. The majority of seizures occurred in airports, train stations, and bus terminals, where the DEA regularly snoops on travel records and maintains a network of travel industry employees who act as confidential informants.

"When seizure and administrative forfeitures do not ultimately advance an investigation or prosecution, law enforcement creates the appearance, and risks the reality, that it is more interested in seizing and forfeiting cash than advancing an investigation or prosecution," the Inspector General warned.

That warning has not been heeded, and Brown and the Institute for Justice plan to continue pursuing their lawsuit.

"The government shouldn't be able to take money for no reason, hang on to it for months, and then give it back like nothing happened, which is why the lawsuit we filed will continue," Brown said. "No one should be forced to go through this nightmare."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: assetforfeiture; dea; seizure; theftundercoloroflaw; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
To: Pearls Before Swine

This guy has filed a Federal lawsuit challenging the entire program.

They are giving him his money back in an effort to make nice and hope he drops it and goes away.

I don’t think he will.


61 posted on 03/05/2020 12:23:21 PM PST by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
"...She says she intended to deposit the money in a bank but ran out of time before her flight."

What happened stinks, but for $82,000 you make time.

62 posted on 03/05/2020 12:23:36 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

A few months ago one network had an expose of Tennessee cops on I-40 seizing cash and only after that letting people go. No doubt much of that ended up in the wallet of the seizing authority. It was all under the guise of checking for drugs. Really rotten law enforcement.


63 posted on 03/05/2020 12:23:41 PM PST by doosee (Captain, we are approaching a new level of Hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: IC Ken
Never EVER carry more than 10K cash.

There are plenty of situations these days where even with big ticket items, cash is king. If you're buying a rig or airplane from an individual, even cashier's checks are no longer safe. As others have mentioned here, it is not illegal to carry cash in this country (yet). I know I sure as hell wouldn't declare any cash I had to some thief that works for the government for any reason whatsoever, because they are as likely as not to "confiscate" it from you, especially if it's not enough money to make it worth your while to fight the seizure.

The entire concept of the government just confiscating money from citizens because they feel like it is evil incarnate. If such a thing were to happen to me, I'd probably end up in jail, because I wouldn't be satisfied with 'legal' remedies.

64 posted on 03/05/2020 12:24:10 PM PST by zeugma (I sure wish I lived in a country where the rule of law actually applied to those in power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

was she running off with dad’s money?


65 posted on 03/05/2020 12:26:05 PM PST by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing obamacare is worse than obamacare itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf
When I travel to Thailand and the Philippines I only carry enough cash to buy food, incidentals at the airports, and taxi fare for when I arrive. Cash I need while "incountry" is available at many ATM's or if PI in my BDO bank account.

Way back in the 60's I carried American Express travelers checks in a belly money belt. This is not the 60's.

66 posted on 03/05/2020 12:27:02 PM PST by ASA Vet (Make American Intelligence Great Again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf
So the people who own the item are never charged with a crime, but their stuff is. That’s funny right there, except it’s not.

It's not actually funny. The reason they do this is because 'stuff' has no constitutional rights. You don't have to prove its guilt. The 'stuff' has to prove its innocence. Very difficult to prove a negative.

67 posted on 03/05/2020 12:31:36 PM PST by zeugma (I sure wish I lived in a country where the rule of law actually applied to those in power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: zeugma

It should also be very difficult to accuse “stuff” of a crime, since there is no intent because it has no brain. Only people can commit crimes. They might was well watch you shoot a man in cold blood, wrestle the gun from your hand and accuse it of murder.


68 posted on 03/05/2020 12:38:16 PM PST by cuban leaf (The political war playing out in every country now: Globalists vs Nationalists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

International travel is a completely different animal. Not even relevant here.


69 posted on 03/05/2020 12:39:06 PM PST by cuban leaf (The political war playing out in every country now: Globalists vs Nationalists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: zeugma
they are pissed off that their victim was able to fight back.

Yup. He was fortunate that all of the local TV stations preferred to run his "poor Yinzer" story for ratings rather than circle the wagons around Uncle Sugar. He attained the one thing that often gets tyrannical bureaucrats to back down. Public humiliation.


70 posted on 03/05/2020 12:39:41 PM PST by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf
International travel is a completely different animal. Not even relevant here.

How so? My ATM card seems to work fine in the US.

71 posted on 03/05/2020 12:41:06 PM PST by ASA Vet (Make American Intelligence Great Again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

There are laws about how much money you can take across the US boarder without claiming it. As long as you are inside the US, there is no law about carrying money. None. It’s your stuff. Carry what you want to. It’s nobody’s business.


72 posted on 03/05/2020 12:42:33 PM PST by cuban leaf (The political war playing out in every country now: Globalists vs Nationalists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf
since there is no intent because it has no brain

Is that how Hillary got away with it? No brain.

73 posted on 03/05/2020 12:43:09 PM PST by ASA Vet (Make American Intelligence Great Again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

PLUS INTEREST!

PLUS DAMAGES!

PLUS JAIL TIME FOR THE DEA AGENTS!


74 posted on 03/05/2020 12:44:14 PM PST by Taxman (We will never be a truly FRee people so long as we have the income tax and the IRS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

You would seize the money? Do you need a new truck. Get a job and earn the money.


75 posted on 03/05/2020 12:45:38 PM PST by DariusBane (Liberty and Risk. Flip sides of the same coin. So how much risk will YOU accept? Vive Deo et Vives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf
It’s nobody’s business

True and I agree, but I prefer not to tell a gang banger it's none of their business.

76 posted on 03/05/2020 12:45:49 PM PST by ASA Vet (Make American Intelligence Great Again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

About time there is push back on this crap.


77 posted on 03/05/2020 12:56:17 PM PST by READINABLUESTATE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doosee

“A few months ago one network had an expose of Tennessee cops on I-40 seizing cash and only after that letting people go. No doubt much of that ended up in the wallet of the seizing authority. It was all under the guise of checking for drugs. Really rotten law enforcement.”

________

There was a story on FR many years ago about an innocent family that was stopped along I-40 in TN. Their dog got out of the car during the search and the dirty cops shot and killed him.


78 posted on 03/05/2020 12:56:19 PM PST by Ken H (Best SOTU ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Daughter was so stupid.


79 posted on 03/05/2020 1:07:11 PM PST by gcparent (Justice Brett Kavanaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

I doubt it, but she was careless.


80 posted on 03/05/2020 1:07:49 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson