1 posted on
03/25/2020 7:22:11 AM PDT by
karpov
To: karpov
unanimous? Was the dumb Latina stuck in an elevator?
2 posted on
03/25/2020 7:24:41 AM PDT by
gibsonguy
To: karpov
3 posted on
03/25/2020 7:25:28 AM PDT by
JZelle
To: karpov
Glad to see this. Will be even better when whites quit overreacting to the accusation itself. Or when so called ‘racism’ is also looked at from that directed toward whites.
To: karpov
Hope this’ll put an end to disparate outcomes nonsense
6 posted on
03/25/2020 7:29:58 AM PDT by
relee
(Till the blue skies drive the dark clouds far away)
To: karpov
The court couldn’t see the “penumbra” in this case.
8 posted on
03/25/2020 7:35:14 AM PDT by
glorgau
To: karpov
9th Circus slapped down again
9 posted on
03/25/2020 7:36:12 AM PDT by
NonValueAdded
("Sorry, your race card has been declined. Can you present any other form of argument?")
To: karpov
It’s nice. But all it does is prove that the Supremes would never rule against Comcast for any reason. The entire supreme court didn’t just suddenly become originalist.
10 posted on
03/25/2020 7:44:12 AM PDT by
DesertRhino
(Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
To: karpov
Someone must have been hoping for a huge payout to keep it going all the way to the SC.
11 posted on
03/25/2020 7:53:13 AM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(A socalist is someone that wants everything you have except your job.)
To: karpov
Racism will continue as long as the Congressional Black Caucus continues to exist. The Supreme Court needs to label the CBC a racist organization, and it should not be allowed to assemble in the hallowed halls of Congress.
12 posted on
03/25/2020 7:57:30 AM PDT by
Saltmeat
(69)
To: karpov
The courts reasoning was simple and clear. It said that for a plaintiff to win a tort due to racial discrimination, it must show it probably would have received the contract or benefit, or not suffered the alleged injury, but for (meaning except for) the defendants allegedly unlawful conduct. In other words, if the race of the plaintiff caused the decision adverse to him, he may have a case. Contrarily, if legitimate, nonracial factors impelled the decision, the suit isnt viable. OMG - - big long-term sane precedent... hallelujah.
13 posted on
03/25/2020 8:07:58 AM PDT by
GOPJ
( http://www.tinyurl.com/cvirusmap https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OfeZlKu8M7A)
To: karpov
And this is why the Senate must remain in GOP hands along with the presidency. The 9th Circuit was the court that reversed the original (correct) decision and essentially called Comcast racissss for not giving a black guys with a youtube-equivalent podcase-level viewership a channel on par with ESPN and Fox News.
To: karpov
So companies accused of racial discrimination are innocent until proven guilty. Imagine that. It’s almost like presumption of innocence is written into our Constitution or something.
Sarcasm aside, it’s nice to see some good news for a change.
15 posted on
03/25/2020 9:17:25 AM PDT by
FormerFRLurker
(Keep calm and vote your conscience.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson