Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

United States v. Joseph
U.S. District Court ^ | 3/23/2020 | District Court D

Posted on 04/12/2020 9:49:32 AM PDT by RideForever

121 Mar 18, 2020

ELECTRONIC NOTICE as to Shelley M. Richmond Joseph, Wesley MacGregor Resetting Hearing. The Motion Hearing on Motion 109 MOTION for Discovery of Grand Jury Instructions, 59 MOTION to Dismiss the Indictment Under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12(b), 61 MOTION to Dismiss Indictment Under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12(b), 105 Objection to Magistrate Judge's 86 Order as to Shelley M. Richmond Joseph and 106 Objection to Magistrate Judge's 86 Order as to Wesley MacGregor, currently scheduled for 4/2/2020, is reset for 6/2/2020 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 13 before District Judge Leo T. Sorokin. (Montes, Mariliz) (Entered: 03/18/2020)

Main Doc

122 Mar 23, 2020

District Judge Leo T. Sorokin:ORDER ON EXCLUDABLE DELAY as to Shelley M. Richmond Joseph, Wesley MacGregor entered. Time excluded from 4/2/2020 until 6/2/2020. Reason for entry of order on excludable delay: 18 USC 3161(h)(7)(A) Interests of justice. (Simeone, Maria) (Entered: 03/23/2020)

Main Doc

Order On Excludable Delay

(Excerpt) Read more at courtlistener.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: 1stcircuit; clownbammyjudge; dmassachusetts; firstcircuit; immigration; judicialactivism; judiciary; leotsorokin; obamajudge; politicaljudiciary; shelleyjoseph
Remember the Massachusetts judge that aided an illegal alien to escape arrest from her court a couple of years ago? This is the docket of actions taken so far. Only the last 2 items on the docket were listed.

She has gotten her full pay restored and moved to a less senior position in a Framingham court in the meantime. Elsewhere you may read of the 61 retired insurrectionist judges who wrote a letter supporting her actions. Some of those likely are found in the Amicus filings.

This came about because of the lack of Comprehensive Immigration Enforcement missing since the 1986 ONE TIME amnesty. The List of Comprehensive Immigration Enforcement, missing since 1986 goes like this -

1) southern barrier; 2) require eVerify to hire; 3) end all chain migration; 4) birthright per Minor v. Happersett (plural parents); 5) end work visas; 6) 10-year moratorium on all new applications for citizenship (40 years to allow workplace automation effects on downsizing population); 7) Set up an illegal aliens’ victim restitution fund.

Enactment of these provisions will motivate illegal aliens to SELF-deport, and remove colonizadors from our welfare rolls.

1 posted on 04/12/2020 9:49:32 AM PDT by RideForever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RideForever

They weaseled it in front of an 0bama judge.


2 posted on 04/12/2020 9:53:11 AM PDT by kiryandil (Chris Wallace: Because someone has to drive the Clown Car)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RideForever
I have to say her lawyers are really good at filing bullshit continuance, discovery and objection motions to drag everything out as far as possible.

The real question is why the Federal judiciary allows such abuse of process. There doesn't seem to be any contention regarding the facts, just her attorneys making unfounded allegations of prosecutorial violations of procedure.

3 posted on 04/12/2020 10:00:41 AM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RideForever

SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS


4 posted on 04/12/2020 10:01:56 AM PDT by wastedyears (The left would kill every single one of us and our families if they knew they could get away with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RideForever

bkmk


5 posted on 04/12/2020 10:04:07 AM PDT by stuckincali
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RideForever

I’m calling BS on this.

Almost all the federal courts have generally suspended actions due to Wuhan. Some have continued routine hearings by telephone or videoconference.


6 posted on 04/12/2020 10:28:06 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

“The real question is why the Federal judiciary allows such abuse of process.”

They want to stay on the gravy train.


7 posted on 04/12/2020 2:55:39 PM PDT by JohnnyP (Thinking is hard work (I stole that from Rush).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson