Pretty sure that's not a "she".
Posted on 04/26/2020 8:58:59 AM PDT by Bruiser 10
Dr. even discusses/alludes to China’s huge advantage in drone technology. (We do have a very large droneport right outside Vegas)
https://www.fastcompany.com/3054550/worlds-first-droneport-under-construction-near-las-vegas
Thousands of weaponized drones would be problematic.
Anyone seen a list of locales using these damn things...
Imagine how many ,Ives could have been saved if someone had run over Hitler with a beer truck.
“suspected of spying”? It’s built into the software of these things. While you fly, the thing is connected to the internet. A few years ago someone suspected something, and plugged in a USB sniffer only to find imagery being sent out to a particular URL...in China. The military soon after stopped contractors from using the things on military contract projects. Also, the military stopped their own people from using them.
Shoulda figured that when the Chinese started doing the “geo fence” thing with the drone software, that it wasn’t much of a stretch for them to be looking at another element of geo location flying...ie tracking for interesting places you might be flying.
Stop this mayor from spying on the citizens of Elizabeth..that is tyranny.
3” shells with #4’s should do the trick.
Plan ahead.
Drones have onboard gps so down it over the mayor's or chief of police's house..
Build anti drone...drones.
I think the Chinese are stupid to be doing this, but they may be smarter than us.
While most of us are rightly concerned concerned about privacy concerns regarding law enforcement’s use of drones to spy on American’s activities, ask yourself why would the Chicoms donate these drones to police departments? What are the consequences? By their actions China is sowing more divisions between citizens and their government with the added intent to subvert the Trump administration that is costing China billions.
OK, by that standard, let's just shut down the power plants, shut down the oil refineries, shut down the factories, shut down the mines, shutdown everything. It will save a lot of lives--until people begin starving and freezing.
She is LIVING PROOF that women should NOT be in charge of cities, states, or countries. Women are too risk-averse.
What is the difference between any of them?
Communists all.
OK, by that standard, let's just shut down the power plants, shut down the oil refineries, shut down the factories, shut down the mines, shutdown everything. It will save a lot of lives--until people begin starving and freezing.
UPDATE: I mis-read it, but it doesn't matter. The statement stands.
OK, by that standard, let's just shut down the power plants, shut down the oil refineries, shut down the factories, shut down the mines, shutdown everything. It will save a lot of lives--until people begin starving and freezing.
UPDATE: I mis-read it, but it doesn't matter. The statement stands.
Oh, brother. I was waiting for the “If you’ve done nothing wrong you have nothing to hide, citizen. Now let us go through your pockets” comment. Fascism with a smiling face, at least until the smiles become too much work.
“Police in Elizabeth, N.J. ... are using the drones to surveil residents in ... back yards”
O...’rly.
Law enforcement flying a drone over my back yard would find themselves in court, post-haste.
Build anti drone...drones.>>> Sling shot $20 USD
“Save just 1 life” phrase used by tyrants the world over.
Pretty sure that's not a "she".
Acts like a “she”. Risk-averse.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.