Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lasereye

“Presumption of innocence”

Who’d have thunk?

Why did it become necessary to put Constitutional language in a Federal regulation?

At least the Øbøzø virus is on the way to eradication.


5 posted on 05/06/2020 7:47:36 PM PDT by lightman (I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lightman

men dont get presumption of innocence if a woman make a charge against them

this is the gross iniquity/injustice of our system at present

rape and sex charges are THE MOST LIED ABOUT charges and any police department or the feds will confirm it by their own statistics

we need to bring back biblical sentencing for ALL LIARS who file false charges against innocent people

the LIARS will get the maximum sentence for what they tried framing the innocent person for.

its not just about framing an innocent person, it’s about deliberately using the courts as a personal weapon to SWAT another person, the courts are used as a patsy and played like a fool, and they don’t appreciate that

iterodes everyone’s trust in the already strained system

all liars should get the max penalty for what they framed the innocent person for. the maximum penalty.


11 posted on 05/06/2020 8:35:40 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson