[Stosh]

from the judge: “To refer to them as “males,” period, is not accurate . . .”

I go along with whatever the attorneys do to push back on that, but in the mean time those attorneys should be able to refer to those males as “chromosomally XY individuals, as opposed to those with XX chromosomes who we commonly refer to as females”.

Ain’t no way any judge can claim that’s not accurate - unless that judge wants to “deny the science”.

[cloudmountain]

I go along with whatever the attorneys do to push back on that, but in the mean time those attorneys should be able to refer to those males as “chromosomally XY individuals, as opposed to those with XX chromosomes who we commonly refer to as females”.
Ain’t no way any judge can claim that’s not accurate - unless that judge wants to “deny the science”.

I believe you have solved the dilemma.
Bravo!

[DesertRhino]

Keep calling them males. Make him jail you for contempt of court. Cockroaches hate the light being turned on