Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

You'll Freeze in the Dark!
Townhall.com ^ | May 13, 2020 | John Stossel

Posted on 05/13/2020 6:18:33 AM PDT by Kaslin

Last Sunday, Mother's Day, made me think how my mom warned me, as a young teen: "Work hard! Or you'll freeze in the dark!"

Sometimes, the warning ended, "Or you'll starve in the cold."

She grew up during the depression. She and her peers were sensibly worried about freezing in the dark.

The message scared me, and I worked hard in school.

When I got my first job, I always put some pay in a savings account, even when (OK, it was long ago) I made only $132 a week. I feared a bad future, and I wanted to make sure I could support myself.

This wasn't all good. I've probably been too anxious all my life. I missed out on things. I didn't contribute to charities until I was in my 40s.

But fear of "freezing in the dark" made me persevere. I studied when I didn't want to. Then I took a job that frightened me.

I'm a stutterer. Stuttering is now among disabilities covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act.

I wonder, had the ADA been law when I started in TV news, would I have struggled as hard to overcome my stutter? Would I have had the career I've had? Probably not.

The TV station wouldn't have hired me. Once the ADA passed, my stutter makes me a member of a "protected class." The station, reasonably, would have viewed me as potential poison.

That's because if they fired me because I didn't work out, I might sue. I could have accused them of failing to "accommodate the disabled," as the law requires. Even if I didn't win, the lawsuit would be expensive. It's safer for employers to avoid members of "protected classes."

Far-fetched? Look at the stats:

Before the ADA passed, 59% of disabled men had jobs. After it passed, the number fell to 48%. Today, fewer than 30% have jobs.

Once again, a law that was supposed to help people did the opposite of what politicians intended.

I think about that when I read about today's $600/week federal unemployment check subsidies for the coronavirus. Added to average $378 state payments, unemployment now often pays better than working.

Incentives matter.

"We have not seen an application in weeks," says Steve Anthony, CEO of the Anthony Timberlands sawmill in Arkansas. He's offering jobs that pay $800/week. But in Arkansas, federal and state unemployment benefits reach $1,051/week.

Anthony told my TV producer Maxim Lott, "If Congress elects to extend this $600 unemployment bonus, it will simply support a higher level of unemployment."

Lott also interviewed Otis Mitchell Jr., who quit his job transporting hospital patients once he learned about the increase in unemployment benefits.

"My little girl is loving it," said Mitchell, because he has more time to spend with her.

But it's bad for hospital patients who need transportation.

Shame on the U.S. government for making unemployment pay better than work.

People who lose jobs because government won't let them work do deserve help. I'm giving more to charities because of that. Charities are able to discriminate -- to discern who really needs help while ignoring freeloaders.

But government is a blunt instrument. Its checks go to people whether or not they try to find work or overcome disabilities.

Over time, as people depend on handouts, they often feel that their lives are no longer within their control. They become passive. They don't push through obstacles. They wait for government help.

Social scientists call this "learned helplessness."

It's the struggle to overcome obstacles that that brings fulfillment.

When government programs "take care of us," they kill off some of the best of life and make us much less productive. They don't even make people happy.

If we keep giving the state more power over our lives, we will freeze in the dark.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: culture; jobsandeconomy

1 posted on 05/13/2020 6:18:33 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

My first job out of college, I was bringing home $125/week. My rent and my parking space under the apartment building were $240/month. I lived on $260/month. This was mid-70’s in Chicago. My older cousin’s advice back then was ‘just make sure there isn’t any month left at the end of the money’. Today’s ‘kids’ have NO IDEA.


2 posted on 05/13/2020 6:23:32 AM PDT by originalbuckeye ('In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act'- George Orwell..?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye

Yes, giving kids everything cripples them for life.


3 posted on 05/13/2020 6:27:01 AM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

There’s less racism in the dark.


4 posted on 05/13/2020 6:33:36 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye

My job working in the general counsel’s office at a state agency (after the JAG Corps) I had a food budget of $25 a week. I had oatmeal for breakfast every day, brought grilled cheese to work for lunch and had pot pie for dinner. It was tight. Every now and then I could splurge on a candy bar out of the machine at work. But it was better than my college diet of popcorn, spaghetti noodles and butter and Dr. Pepper.


5 posted on 05/13/2020 7:05:28 AM PDT by yldstrk (Bingo! We have a winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

The only credit card I had at the time, was a Shell gas card. I applied for that thinking if I ran out of money, at least I could fill my car to get to work. It wasn’t easy, but I never wanted to lean on my parents for ‘help’. Seems that many in the younger generations don’t really put personal responsibility as a priority.


6 posted on 05/13/2020 7:10:22 AM PDT by originalbuckeye ('In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act'- George Orwell..?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This article well describes the Democrat Party’s plan to create a voting base of government dependent serfs. the scary part is that they are more than halfway there.

“Over time, as people depend on handouts, they often feel that their lives are no longer within their control. They become passive. They don’t push through obstacles. They wait for government help.

Social scientists call this “learned helplessness.”


7 posted on 05/13/2020 7:46:39 AM PDT by RicocheT (Don't argue with an idiot; people watching may not be able to tell the difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

As Rudyard Kipling put it a century ago:

In the Carboniferous Epoch we were promised abundance for all,
By robbing selected Peter to pay for collective Paul;
But, though we had plenty of money, there was nothing our money could buy,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: “If you don’t work you die.”


8 posted on 05/14/2020 4:46:04 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson