Right so we can accept no risk of illness and therefore must demolish the economy. But if there’s a little bitty risk to our blood supplies, not a problem if it permits signaling our virtue to favored constituencies.
I get it.
wasn’t this the freak that wanted men to get neutered?
What, a two fer!
Now you can get the Kung Flu and a side of extra HIV with your transfusion. Maybe even Hep C and Mad Cow!
Anyone seen this one:
https://100percentfedup.com/mi-ag-attacks-77-yr-old-barber-for-opening-his-business-while-gay-nightclub-near-whitmers-mansion-remains-open/
it ‘s been revealed that the doors to Club Tabu, a gay club, and “Swingers Sanctuary,” that’s less than 2.5 miles from Governor Gretchen Whitmer’s mansion in Lansing, MI, is open for business, while Michigan’s gay attorney general threatens the 77-year-old barber for opening his doors to save his business.
Ya, cuz nobody cares about HIV contaminated blood......
Ya, cuz nobody cares about HIV contaminated blood......
As Scripture accurately states, those who belong to the devil are BLINDED.
Syphilis,Hep C,HIV being just three.No way should perverts be donating *anything* that should be "inserted" into another person.
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
This is an evil thing to do. The democrat party is a death cult.
These science-deniers are always crowing for a “risked based” assessment for deferring donors (men how have sex with men IS the risk), but how many homosexual men would still qualify under risk-based assessments that are rational? They would STILL not be satisfied with the deferral requirements, and either push more to scrap even the risk-base questions or restrict normal homosexual relationships to the same standard that homosexual men would be, thereby severely limiting the blood supply. A faithfully married man and woman together for 30 years would be deferred.