Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Been saying it for years: President Trump needs to move his account to conservative alternatives like Parler or Parler. He does have 77 million followers on Twitter after all. At the same time, Twitter should be sued by the DOJ, The Trump campaign, the House Republicans, and the GOP itself for at the very least, illegal campaign contributions to the Democrats and more. Thing is, it will take too long for that to go through the courts for it to be of much use in the 2020 elections.
1 posted on 05/26/2020 9:25:03 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SmokingJoe

Conservative alternatives like Parler or Gab.


2 posted on 05/26/2020 9:26:31 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmokingJoe

Trump won’t do anything other than try to bluff Twitter into playing fair. It’s a losing tactic.


3 posted on 05/26/2020 9:36:53 PM PDT by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmokingJoe

Given the Democrats’ wet-dream of 100% mail-in voting I’m wondering if there is a way to prevent ballot stuffing while still keeping who you voted for a secret.

Here’s an idea. Every voter has a social security number and a date of birth, right? So compute HMAC(SSN+DOB+Secret1)=QR using a one-way Hash-based Message Authentication Code [HMAC]. Secret1 is randomly generated by the election bureau for each ballot. Print it as a scannable QR code on the ballot (think TicketMaster).

This gives each ballot a unique QR such that no two ballots with different SSNs and birthdates are the same, preventing duplication. The voter can later confirm that his/her ballet was indeed counted by entering in their SSN + DOB at the election registrar’s website to check.

The other problem is vote tampering. Using the same basic system the voter can verify on the registrar’s website to confirm who they voted for. When the ballot is received the registrar scans the QR and computes HMAC(QR+MyVote+Secret2), where Secret2 is known only to the registrar. Do this for each political office on the ballot. The voter can then go to the website and enter their personal info to confirm that the vote was counted correctly.

You can strengthen the privacy of the system by using something like two-factor authentication where a second entity (not the registrar) counter-signs each QR with Secret3.

This system guarantees privacy, prevents ballot duplication, and detects vote tampering. Or is it too easy?


4 posted on 05/26/2020 9:44:21 PM PDT by Gideon7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmokingJoe

Conservative alternatives? Really?


13 posted on 05/27/2020 2:40:29 AM PDT by Deplorable American1776 (Proud to be a DeplorableAmerican with a Deplorable Family...even the dog is, too. :-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson