Are you sure? The ruling interpreted legislation. Why can't they pass legislation that makes explicit whaty "sex" means? Of course, then that legislation gets "interpreted."
“Of course, then that legislation gets “interpreted.””
Yes, exactly. It’s true that this decision didn’t “discover” some Constitutional principle that Congress couldn’t overrule, but if they just passed a law to make what was explicit in the original law even more explicit, the Supreme Court would just overrule it. The nature of this decision makes that pretty plain.
Don't spoil a good rant with your pesky facts.