Posted on 06/26/2020 10:29:48 AM PDT by Kaslin
Prior studies have suggested a weak connection between the intrusive government measures to slow the spread of COVID-19 and the progression of the virus.
Texas is in the news, and not in a good way, over an increase in COVID-19 cases over the past four weeks. Theres quite a bit of speculation over why the virus, which largely bypassed the Lone Star State until the end of May, suddenly seemed to become more pernicious.
Some point to a lack of enforcement for social distancing measures and masks. Yet California, a state of similar size and demographics, where Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom was far more aggressive in pursuing a shutdown than Republican Gov. Greg Abbott, has seen a case increase of about the same magnitude, which even started at about the same time as Texas.
Unemployment numbers can give us a sense of how widespread the shutdowns in each state were. Since February, Californias unemployment rate jumped 12.4 percent to 16.3 percent in May, while Texas saw an increase of 9.5 percent to 13 percent over the same period.
Prior studies have suggested a weak connection between the intrusive government measures to slow the spread of COVID-19 and the progression of the virus, suggesting that due to its ease of transmission in certain environments, such as mass transit and residences, it will inevitably spread until a certain percentage of the population develops immunity.
Had Californias unemployment rate gone up only as much as the rate in Texas, the state would have saved about 600,000 jobs. What did California gain for this sacrifice? Perhaps not much. According to The New York Times interactive coronavirus site, as of June 25, Californias per capita case count is 9 percent higher than Texass and its per capita fatality rate is 89 percent higher than in Texas.
Of course, both states pale in comparison to the losses in New York, where Democrat Gov. Andrew Cuomos deadly misstep of placing seniors with active cases of the virus into nursing homes to clear space in hospitals resulted in tens of thousands of additional deaths. New Yorks per capita case count remains about four times higher than that in either California or Texas, and its fatality rate is 11 times greater than Californias and a staggering 21 times greater than Texas. While the trends are troubling in Americas two most-populous states, due to several factors, they arent likely to get close to, much less exceed, New Yorks debacle.
The intense focus by the media and the political left on largely conservative states where the virus toll is mounting (from a low base) plays into the very human, and often irrational, perception of risk. If the number of cases goes from 10 to 20, thats a doubling, and the public gasps. Yet if the number of cases goes from 1,000 to 1,100, we collectively yawn.
Similarly, we dont do well with unseen but very real effects, as observed by French economist Frédéric Bastiat in 1850. To list one example, COVID-19 largely spares school-age children its most harmful effects, meaning measures like cancelling school and disrupting friendships may lead to far greater losses from suicide than the virus could ever threaten. Further, the lost months and years of education will visit negative consequences on the COVID generation for the remainder of their lives. But those consequences are unseenfor now.
Returning to Texas, there are four reasons frequently given for the recent increase in cases: Abbott and those liberty-loving Texans opened up too soon (that California surged while locked down more than Texas doesnt help this argument); cases appeared to mount just after Memorial Day, when many people visited friends and relatives; cases increased among the young after large protests that started about a week after Memorial Day, and; large numbers of infected Mexicans and Central Americans are fleeing across the southern border as Mexico has forgone any coherent COVID response, leaving its already weak medical system wholly unprepared to cope.
Regardless of the reasons for the virus increased prevalence in Texassomething likely unavoidable until enough people develop immunity, whether through catching it or by being vaccinated once a vaccine is developed and proventhe state is now dealing with an increase in hospitalizations. This means were hearing calls for Abbott to roll back the states economic and social opening.
Unfortunately, the rhetoric over Texas hospital capacity is clouded by a lack of understanding and, in all too many cases, a ghoulish partisan glee.
The first thing to understand about hospitals is that they are businesses and if they dont generate more income than expenses, they are forced to lay off doctors and nurses, forego the acquisition of costly but life-saving medical equipment, and eventually close their doors. This was seen all over America a few months ago when hospitals were directed to cut back on elective procedures to make way for an expected wave of coronavirus patients that, with the exception of some states in the Northeast, thankfully never materialized. This led to a round of layoffs as hospitals nationwide struggled with a plunge in revenue.
The second factor to consider is that Abbotts COVID-19 response team, lead by former state representative and anesthesiologist Dr. John Zerwas, put together a flexible five-phase system to expand hospital bed, ICU bed, and ventilator capacity as needed. This advance work led to an 89 percent increase in available capacity from the onset of the virus to mid-June.
Lastly, as Texas regional hospital systems and public health officials saw the immediate threat from the virus recede in May, the number of critical elective procedures rose, as people with heart disease, breast cancer, colon cancer, and other life-threatening conditions, sought treatmentin too many cases, dangerously delayed.
Thus, uninformed critics of Texasor outright partisan scaremongersclaimed in recent days that Houstons medical system was about to be overrun by virus patients, pointing to the slender margins of the regions ICU capacity, with 95 percent of the beds full. The critics failed to note two rather important factors.
As an example, at the Texas Medical Center, one of Houstons largest hospital networks, some 70 percent of the available ICU beds as of June 23 were taken by non-COVID patients, with 27 percent treating patients suffering from the virus and 3 percent of the beds available. However, that total ICU number was without activating the systems sustainable surge capacity, which would quickly add another 373 bedsmore than the 362 beds currently being used by virus patients.
Further, as virus cases are admitted to the hospital system, elective patients can be cycled out as they recover and elective procedures can be scaled back to make more room. If the Texas Medical Center receives even more COVID patients, they can activate their unsustainable surge capacity, adding another 504 beds for a total of 2,207 beds in a system currently treating 362 COVID patientsa six-fold increase in ICU capacity currently treating virus patients. The misinformation got so bad that the leaders of Houstons hospital network issued a statement on Thursday assuring Houstonians that they had ample capacity to handle the expected increases in COVID-19 patients.
The focus on hospitalizations and more serious ICU or ventilator use misses a few other vital factors. First, our understanding of the virus and how to treat it has improved significantly over the past few months.
We know to lay patients prone if they are having breathing difficulty, avoiding use of ventilators as much as possible. We now have a wider array of treatments that appear to improve the chances for recovery. And, due to increased testing, a larger share of people who were previously not likely to be hospitalized are now being placed under observation.
Further, the number of patients receiving treatment might be higher for the simple reason that hospitals have been incentivized to take them due to the 20 percent financial incentive passed by Congress for treating Medicare patients with COVID-19, with many insurance companies joining in after being pressured by governors.
This leads to one statistic that, in its finality, is the true arbiter of how hard a state is being hit by COVID-19: fatalities. In this grim statistic, Texas is still doing relatively well, although time will tell, as deaths typically lag cases and hospitalizations by six to nine days.
Even so, the running seven-day average of deaths in Texas has been trending down since it first peaked in late April. In New York City, 584 people lost their lives to the virus on April 7. New York City has 28 percent of Texas population. Texass worst day of fatalities was 58 on May 14less than one-tenth New Yorks grim toll with more than three times the population.
Looking at New York state, with 65 percent of Texas population, Texas would have to suffer 47,700 fatalities to reach the Empire States per capita death toll. As of June 25, Texas had lost 2, 296 of its residents to COVID-19.
Is the virus spreading in Texas? Yes. Is it time for panic? No.
“... .the surge, in Harris County hospitals (and other areas) is, imo, directly related to the Floyd protests.”
This, it cannot be shouted out loud enough. No politician seems to want to even get close to mentioning this very salient FACT.
It is ironic that the ferals that were running around in close groups destroying other peoples businesses are very likely the ones that are getting sick today and driving up the case numbers. If I were vindictive I would hope that the ferals really do get sick, very very sick, so sick that a bullet thru the brain case sounds like a reasonable thing.
No no, it’s a giant conspiracy by the doctors cause they hate our freedom!
“””The Democrat/Left needs to keep these soul-crushing mandates going to the first Tuesday in November to have even an outside chance against Trump.”””
So true. The Democrat Leftists need to have mail ballots sent to every registered voter (whether that voter is dead, alive, moved) to have a chance at beating Trump.
The only way mass mail voting will happen is if we continue to lockdown and keep the Kung Flu simmering until November.
Please clarify. Did Pence come right out and say that these spikes are due to young protesters? That would be EPIC if he did. The media has worked triple-overtime to suppress such talk.
VP did NOT specifically say that these spikes are due to protesters.
He DID say that roughtly half of the number of new cases, in this spike, are primarily people 35 and under.
He says it here, at the 26:45 mark....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WgA0HG1JPYU
Dep....if I missed where he specifically called out the protesters, please let us know about where in the briefing VP said this. Thanks.
Just look at the Harris County hospitals that are being “overwhelmed” with COVID cases. Ben Taub and and LBJ.
Add to that what VP Pence said, at today’s CV briefing...that HALF of the new cases, in this spike, are of people 35 and younger.
Fact + Fact = PROTESTS
Follow the money is right. Hospitals are corporations.
If that is true and it is the protestors hopefully they ate fatal.
If that is true and it is the protestors hopefully they ate fatal.
This is all a strategy in the war we’re too stupid to know we’re fighting. And we thought the British were stupid,standing in a row with their nice red coats? Really?
What is the one thing the southern states have had in common, that could have led to this increase in infection rates?
The answer—the widespread use of air conditioning.
Covid is spread when droplets carrying the infection are expelled into the air. Remember how choirs and such were prime transmitters of Covid? That’s because infected people singing, or talking loudly, expel droplets of infected water into the air where others breath it in.
Isn’t that exactly how air conditioning works?
I've noticed that more people are wearing masks again in Walmart and HEB.
Every state will have its blow-off high spike of cases. The ones having that now didn’t have it earlier. Now it’s their turn.
It won’t last very long.
Then politicians will claim their mask rules and lockdowns beat the virus. Bull. It does what it does regardless of our actions. It spreads until it runs out of hosts that are affected, then it dies off.
“Is it magical?”
Apparently only if it can be used to get businesses to shut down again and go broke-and more people to run around with their hair on fire in a panic-(S)...
“If that is true and it is the protestors hopefully they ate fatal.”
Eff you, that’s a horrible thing to say, unless you confine it to the rioters, which are a small minority of the protestors. The majority of 60’s protestors grew out of their leftism and lived normal productive lives. They are now in 70’s and are the ones not liking masks and lockdowns.
Fact + Fact = PROTESTS
Jane, did you see where Sylvester suggested starting a wall of shame for restaurants and businesses that don’t follow his guidelines? I told the idiot his name ought to be on the top of the list since he allowed hundreds and hundreds of marchers....protesters, mourners, funerals, burial and mask-optional??? What a fraud and hypocrite!!! Typical of a Demonrat......
Of course Texas has a spike! All the protests/riots and the political funeral of Saint George the Gregory! That place was packed!!
The good thing about testing is it can tell infected people to isolate so they don’t infect their families. As far as research, looking at sewage sludge is more productive.
Yes and? It is worse when hospital capacities are exceeded, and better when they aren’t. But take a step back and grok that this isn’t a hospital problem, it is a disease, and hospitals are just a part of this. The goal is to avoid getting sick and going to the hospital in the first place, not to go to the bar, get sick, and have a ventilator warmed up and waiting for you.
Make it rioters then if that suits you. I misspoke Meanwhile your contention about the rioters and bombers of the 60s is completely not true. In fact, if you look close enough, you can see they are still around. As you distinguish the protesters from the rioters, I have now too so thanks for pointing that out. Today’s rioters are scum.
As far as the protesters of the 60s and today go, they are what I call fellow travelers. Useful idiots would be a second choice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.