Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nopardons

Dickens wasn’t a realist in the modern sense. He created his own universe and populated with more diverse types than any other writer since Shakespeare.


66 posted on 06/30/2020 12:51:29 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: Borges
Not a "realist"?

Is that WHY he used newspaper articles and Henry Mayhew's books ( LONDON'S UNDERWORLD and MAYHEW'S LONDON ) as basis for many characters, as well as his fictionalized own life for his novels?

You might just as well then claim that Dominick Dunne's books weren't "realistic".

What about Dickens' best friend, Wilkie Collins' works? Are you going to tell me that his characters weren't just as "diverse", if not more so?

67 posted on 06/30/2020 1:18:15 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson