[bitt]

p

[ClearCase_guy]

I don't mean to be lazy. But at this point, if we've really been gathering evidence — if we really understand what happened — if we really want to sell the public on this stuff, then these stories need to be told differently.

Person A was out to get President Trump.
Their main strategy to do this was to pursue X.
In order to do this, Person A teamed up with Person B to initiate Y as a means of achieving X.

Lay
It
Out

Tell me who the Good Guys are. Tell me who the Bad Guys are. Tell me Why they did what they did. What was the purpose? The strategy?

I'm tired of stories that are endlessly layered and constantly dropping hints “I'm going to tell you, but first you need to understand ... but before we get to that, let’s remember ... and that is important, but first we need to explore ... and let's recall his relationship with her -— which can really only be understood once we explore this other thing ..."

That's not what I want. Sell me the simple version. Good Guys. Bad Guys. What was their Plan? Tell me in a paragraph. Then spend 44 pages justifying it.

The public doesn't want to be tantalized by hints and subtleties. The public needs a COMPELLING NARRATIVE.

And articles like this are NOT a compelling narrative.

[griswold3]

Mark

[LS]

Yep. I have no confidence at all in Barrstool or Bull Durham.

No one is going to jail. That’s a reality everyone should accept.