Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

I’m old enough to remember Letters to the Editor. They were always subject to editing for length and to remove anything the editor thought wads inappropriate or libelous. That’s because the newspaper was a publisher and could be held legally responsible for what it published.

The phone company could not be sued if someone made a slanderous statement over it’s lines because it was not a publisher, but a neutral platform or common carrier.

As long as the exercise editorial judgement, we must stop treating social media companies like neutral platforms and hold them responsible for the content they publish.


4 posted on 08/01/2020 11:01:31 AM PDT by bigbob (Trust Trump. Trust the Plan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bigbob
They are involved in "election interference!"

Crimes have been committed.

7 posted on 08/01/2020 11:23:28 AM PDT by TruthWillWin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson