Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: saywhatagain; Liz

And so the actual “russia, russia, russia” money, its power, its influence tracks back to Ukraine, to McCain, to Biden, and to Hillary.

Through the Deep State bureaucracies of Obama’s White House.


16 posted on 08/19/2020 7:02:44 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE ( I can only donate monthly, but the radical ABCNNBCBS does it every hour on their news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Robert A Cook PE
Did the NY Times admit — and defend — Obama’s spying on Trump?
NYPOST.COM ^ | may 4, 2019 | Michael Goodwin / FR Posted by Liz

The NYT is reporting Obama's FBI sent a “cloaked investigator” to London to meet with Trump aide George Papadopoulos in Sept 2016.....spinning news designed to protect deep-state sources. AG Barr’s promise to investigate the investigators spooked the Deep State. The result is news with a “modified limited hangout” approach, where fragments are presented as revelations while the full picture ­remains artfully hidden.

The NYT story repeatedly suggests Azra Turk is an FBI agent, but doesn’t say so directly probably means she isn’t. Reporter Adam Goldman, told CNN they called Turk a government investigator “for a reason, and I’m going to leave it at that”.....said the deep-state errand boy. Naturally, all sources are anonymous, identified generally as “people familiar with the operation.” My guess is they include Jim Comey, Andrew McCabe and other dirty cops worried they are in Barr’s crosshairs. They should worry, especially about Barr’s probe into leaks. There is no question that FBI officials were among the same reporters’ sources all along as the Times painted Trump as a Russian agent.

Which is why the NYT assures readers there was nothing amiss in the Obama-ordered spying, arguing that the existence of an “operation aimed at a presidential campaign” reveals “the level of alarm inside the FBI” over Russian ­efforts to disrupt the 2016 election......an odd and extremely biased way to describe the possibly illegal ­effort by the Obama admin to spy on the presidential campaign of the opposition. Imagine how that sentence would be written if a Republican president spied on a Democratic candidate. And why are the reporters certain the spying was legitimate and not a plot to stop Trump from being elected? Because their sources say so, making this a powerful example of why the Times was wrong to abolish its standards. (Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...

==================================

NYT's seems certain the Obama spying was legitimate and not a plot to stop Trump from being elected.....if that's true why didnt they go after the Russians instead of Trump and his campaign apparat?

The scared-stiff Obama dictatorship feared Trump. The lawless Obama had plenty to hide. They were counting on Hillary to sweep it all under the rug. Obama ordered (A) the entire US intel apparat (created to protect American safety and security), and, (B) suck-up Eric Holder's DOJ, to spy on the Trump campaign, the Trump transition and the Trump presidency.

Explains the goofy OMG face on the goon-faced Halfrican when he met the impressive president-elect.
The dirt Hillary was supposed to sweep under the rug is now in the hands of the man the Halfrican tried to destroy.

"After all we did for her, that lousy Hillary lost. "How’m I gonna get out of the mess I’m in?"
"I know, we’ll invent Russian collusion..lie like crazy...setup Trump to take the blame.”

17 posted on 08/19/2020 7:12:25 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson